2023
DOI: 10.1097/hs9.0000000000000857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The R2-ISS in a Multicenter Cohort of Chinese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, MM often ultimately relapses, leading to a refractory disease. In recent years, the second revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) has emerged as a useful prognostic tool for both newly diagnosed and untreated patients with MM and those undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation [3][4][5]. However, these prognostic tools are determined by factors such as beta-2 microglobulin (β2MG), albumin (Alb), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and the presence of high-risk chromosomal abnormalities (HRCAs) at the time of diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, MM often ultimately relapses, leading to a refractory disease. In recent years, the second revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) has emerged as a useful prognostic tool for both newly diagnosed and untreated patients with MM and those undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation [3][4][5]. However, these prognostic tools are determined by factors such as beta-2 microglobulin (β2MG), albumin (Alb), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and the presence of high-risk chromosomal abnormalities (HRCAs) at the time of diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, evidence suggests that MM subclones with gain/amp(1q) frequently expand during different treatments [ 9 ], implying that a minor clone of gain/amp(1q) may be associated with CIN in MM. Nevertheless, most centers have now established a cutoff value of 20% [ 4 , 8 , 12 , 17 19 ] or 30% [ 20 ] for gain/amp(1q), with only a few using slightly smaller cutoff values of 3.5% [ 10 ], 5% [ 21 ] or 5.5% [ 22 ] for gain/amp(1q). These relatively large cutoff values have made it unclear whether a minor clone of gain/amp(1q) should be considered a high-risk CA in MM and whether it is associated with CIN in MM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%