2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10691-006-9012-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Question of Evil and Feminist Legal Scholarship

Abstract: A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.For more information, please contact eprints@nottingham.ac.uk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most notorious case of a woman convicted in connection with child murder in England is undoubtedly that of Myra Hindley, who, during her 36 years of imprisonment, maintained the status of a national hate figure. Even after her death in 2002 – when ‘references to her as an icon of modern evil were ubiquitous’ (Murphy and Whitty, 2006: 4) – she remained despised as a manipulative, self-serving ‘schemer, prepared to trick anyone to be free’ (Stanford in Murphy and Whitty, 2006: 6). However, she acted with another person, Ian Brady, who was considered to be the main perpetrator by the sentencing judge.…”
Section: The Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most notorious case of a woman convicted in connection with child murder in England is undoubtedly that of Myra Hindley, who, during her 36 years of imprisonment, maintained the status of a national hate figure. Even after her death in 2002 – when ‘references to her as an icon of modern evil were ubiquitous’ (Murphy and Whitty, 2006: 4) – she remained despised as a manipulative, self-serving ‘schemer, prepared to trick anyone to be free’ (Stanford in Murphy and Whitty, 2006: 6). However, she acted with another person, Ian Brady, who was considered to be the main perpetrator by the sentencing judge.…”
Section: The Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, commentators and scholars interested in creating a more complex subject position for Myra Hindley have considered her level of agency in relation to her infatuation with, and fear of, Brady. In this regard, he was a convicted criminal by the time he met Myra and 5 years her senior, whereas Myra’s life, until that point, had been ‘unremarkable’ (Birch, 1993; Ballinger, 1996; French, 1996: 33; Morrissey, 2003; Murphy and Whitty, 2006). As such, her agency has been analysed, not only in relation to her role as a child killer, but also in relation to subject positions such as ‘naive dupe’ and victim (Morrissey, 2003: 135).…”
Section: The Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, within the 'risk society thesis' there are 'several distinct literatures, involving different projects, different forms of inquiry, and different conceptions of their subject matter, all linked tenuously together by a tantalizing four letter word' (Garland, 2001: 49). Murphy and Whitty (2006) have advanced the discussion further by suggesting that there are in fact four 'lines of descent' that underpin existing embodiments of the 'risk society' discourse. Firstly, Douglas's anthropological work (1986Douglas's anthropological work ( , 1992 on culture and risk focuses upon cultural exchanges of information on risk factors, as opposed to the scientific communication of risk.…”
Section: Antisocial Behaviour and The 'Risk Society Thesis'mentioning
confidence: 99%