2018
DOI: 10.1039/c7cp08687c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The quest for determining one-electron redox potentials of azulene-1-carbonitriles by calculation

Abstract: Accurate predictions of redox potentials through a simple methodology employing methods that are all implemented in standard electronic structure packages.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using M06 and M06-2X, we computed E Fc/Fc + to be 4.97 and 5.31 V, respectively. The former, as expected, shows a better agreement with reported theoretical estimation (4.8 ± 0.1 V) while the latter displays severe overestimation. All redox potentials were evaluated with E DFT = −Δ G / nF , where Δ G stands for taking the A/A + redox couple as example, the change of free energy for A + (soln) + Fc (soln) → A (soln) + Fc + (soln) .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Using M06 and M06-2X, we computed E Fc/Fc + to be 4.97 and 5.31 V, respectively. The former, as expected, shows a better agreement with reported theoretical estimation (4.8 ± 0.1 V) while the latter displays severe overestimation. All redox potentials were evaluated with E DFT = −Δ G / nF , where Δ G stands for taking the A/A + redox couple as example, the change of free energy for A + (soln) + Fc (soln) → A (soln) + Fc + (soln) .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Validation of our computational method used for determination of redox potentials was supported by a linear correlation plot (LCP) of experimental ( E exp ) and calculated absolute ( E abs ) redox potentials (Figure 5; Figure ). A nearly perfect correlation between experimental and calculated redox potentials using CAM‐B3LYP/6‐31+g(d,p) is observed, validating the good performance of this method previously observed in the work of Ree et al 35 The LCP of M06‐2X/6‐31+G(d,p) shows much worse correlation, which can be tracked back as a trend to overestimate the oxidation potential; M06‐2X/6‐31+G(d,p) should not be disregarded as a method as its predictions and hence errors are systematic. Omitting diffuse functions (6‐31G(d,p)) significantly deteriorates the correlation observed for the CAM‐B3LYP and the M06‐2X methods (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“… a Measured in CH 2 Cl 2 (1.0 × 10 –5 M). b Measured in CH 2 Cl 2 (1.0 × 10 –6 M). c Values in 10 4 L mol –1 cm –1 . d Calculated at the B3LYP-D/6-31G­(d) level. The t Bu groups were omitted for simpler calculations. e Oscillator strength. f Absolute fluorescence quantum yield. g Half-wave potential obtained from cyclic voltammetry (0.5 mM in CH 2 Cl 2 , 0.1 M n Bu 4 NPF 6 electrolyte, 100 mV/s scan rate). h Calculated from the first oxidation potential and calibrated against the ferrocene–ferrocenium (F c /F c + ) redox couple (−4.8 eV below the vacuum level) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%