2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16048.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The quasar relation through cosmic time - I. Data set and black hole masses

Abstract: We study the M BH -M host relation as a function of cosmic time in a sample of 96 quasars from z = 3 to the present epoch. In this paper, we describe the sample, the data sources and the new spectroscopic observations. We then illustrate how we derive M BH from single-epoch spectra, pointing out the uncertainties in the procedure. In a companion paper, we address the dependence of the ratio between the black hole mass and the host-galaxy luminosity and mass on cosmic time.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…BH mass estimates are computed from either the virial method (for broad-line sources; e.g., Woo et al 2008;Kim et al 2008;Decarli et al 2010b;Bennert et al 2010;Merloni et al 2010; see §4.1) or via some assumptions about the relationship between obscured and unobscured AGNs (as for SMGs; Alexander et al 2008a), each of which have significant uncertainty. The presence of an AGN also presents the additional challenge of separating the light from the host galaxy to that from the accreting BH, and difficulties in separating the mass or potential of the stellar bulge from the rest of the galaxy (e.g., Decarli et al, 2010a;Merloni et al, 2010).…”
Section: Correlations Between Bhs and Galaxy Spheroidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BH mass estimates are computed from either the virial method (for broad-line sources; e.g., Woo et al 2008;Kim et al 2008;Decarli et al 2010b;Bennert et al 2010;Merloni et al 2010; see §4.1) or via some assumptions about the relationship between obscured and unobscured AGNs (as for SMGs; Alexander et al 2008a), each of which have significant uncertainty. The presence of an AGN also presents the additional challenge of separating the light from the host galaxy to that from the accreting BH, and difficulties in separating the mass or potential of the stellar bulge from the rest of the galaxy (e.g., Decarli et al, 2010a;Merloni et al, 2010).…”
Section: Correlations Between Bhs and Galaxy Spheroidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference can be attributed to the different continuum regions adopted by Vanden Berk et al (2001) We have also applied different continuum regions to gauge the dependence of the fit on the windows adopted. We considered the intervals listed by Decarli et al (2010) for a sample of 96 quasars at redshift lower than 3 with spectra collected from several instrument (e.g., SDSS, ESO/NTT, Nordic Optical Telescope, and HST). Specifically, the alternative windows adopted are 1351−1362, 1452−1480, 1680−1710, 1796−1834, 1970−2010, and 2188−2243Å.…”
Section: Spectral Fit and Emission Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the optimum selection criteria, we have taken the composite quasar spectrum from Decarli et al (2010), which consists of 96 bright quasars at 0 < z < 3. We chose this template because at red wavelengths it is less affected by host galaxy contamination than other composite spectra in the literature (e.g., Francis et al 1991;Vanden Berk et al 2001) and it samples the rest frame wavelengths of 5.7 < z < 7.2 quasars in the PS1 filters.…”
Section: Selection Of Quasar Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Left: the bottom panel shows the PS1 capture cross section in units of m 2 e −1 photon −1 for the i P1 , z P1 , and y P1 bands (Tonry et al 2012). The three upper panels show the composite quasar spectrum from Decarli et al (2010; with the intergalactic medium correction from Meiksin 2006) redshifted to z = 5.6, z = 6.0, and z = 6.3, from bottom to top. The gray dashed lines show the wavelength of the Lyα line at each redshift.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation