2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2015.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The quartet theory of human emotions: An integrative and neurofunctional model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
108
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 240 publications
(246 reference statements)
3
108
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower FA in the uncinate may point to a dysfunctional interaction between the orbitofrontal-centered and hippocampal affect systems as defined in the recently published Quartet Theory on Emotions (Koelsch et al, 2015). The theory suggests that four different affect systems in the brain generate different classes of affect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Lower FA in the uncinate may point to a dysfunctional interaction between the orbitofrontal-centered and hippocampal affect systems as defined in the recently published Quartet Theory on Emotions (Koelsch et al, 2015). The theory suggests that four different affect systems in the brain generate different classes of affect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It may be true that in the context of Berlyne’s theory, which has arousal at its core, the relationship between hedonic tone and complexity may not always follow an inverted-U curve; however, arousal may still play a decisive role during esthetic episodes (Marin and Leder, 2013). Consequently, we highlight not only the need to study autonomic arousal but also the investigation of brain correlates of subjective arousal levels that may be associated with different neural affect systems (Koelsch et al, 2015) during esthetic experiences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the emerging field of neurocognitive poetics, not addressed in Brown et al’s meta-analysis, the Panksepp-Jakobson Hypothesis (Jacobs, 2015b) expresses this similarly in an attempt to bridge the language-emotion gap. This concerns the gap between neurobiological theories of emotion, as perhaps best represented by Panksepp’s (1998) core affect systems theory, and complex (psycho-)linguistic models, as exemplified by Jakobson’s (1960) extended version of Bühler’s (1934) ‘organon model’ of language functions (Jacobs et al, 2015; see Koelsch et al, 2015, for a theory linking emotion and language). Stated simply, the Panksepp-Jakobson Hypothesis submits that since evolution had no time to invent a proper affective system for art reception, even less so for reading, the emotional and aesthetic processes we experience when reading must be somehow linked to the ancient neuronal affect circuits we share with all mammals (Panksepp, 1998).…”
Section: The Role Of Valence and Beauty In Theories Of Emotion Aesthmentioning
confidence: 99%