2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The quantitative techno-economic comparisons and multi-objective capacity optimization of wind-photovoltaic hybrid power system considering different energy storage technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A presented review of different sizing methodologies for hybrid wind/ solar/ storage systems is given in [48]. Optimal capacity sizing and different storage technologies in wind/solar and energy storage hybrid systems, analyzed in [49], find that battery storage systems prove to be the most cost-effective besides thermal energy storage systems in such multi-optimization strategy. All of the given analyzes show that high initial investment costs, as barriers to wider storage grid integration, can be overcome by combining energy storage systems in specific applications with intermittent renewable energy sources.…”
Section: Hybrid Power Systems With Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A presented review of different sizing methodologies for hybrid wind/ solar/ storage systems is given in [48]. Optimal capacity sizing and different storage technologies in wind/solar and energy storage hybrid systems, analyzed in [49], find that battery storage systems prove to be the most cost-effective besides thermal energy storage systems in such multi-optimization strategy. All of the given analyzes show that high initial investment costs, as barriers to wider storage grid integration, can be overcome by combining energy storage systems in specific applications with intermittent renewable energy sources.…”
Section: Hybrid Power Systems With Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper layer objective function includes the primary energy rate (PER) and the annual ACSR. In [31], a wind-PV hybrid power system was developed then the levelized cost of energy and loss of power supply probability of the model were optimized using the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for supplying energy. The optimization of the model was accomplished in [32] by using a predatory parasitic algorithm (PPA) to improve the system efficiency and reduce hydrogen consumption.…”
Section: Nomenclaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, in [12], particle swarm optimization (PSO) and power flow are combined to minimize the total network cost by optimizing the location and size of HPPs. In [13], a multi-objective heuristic algorithm is applied to minimize the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) and the loss of power supply probability (LPSP) by optimizing the size of RESs and a single ESS within the HPP. An improved version of [13] is proposed in [14] by considering hybrid storage (two different storage technologies) within the same HPP.…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], a multi-objective heuristic algorithm is applied to minimize the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) and the loss of power supply probability (LPSP) by optimizing the size of RESs and a single ESS within the HPP. An improved version of [13] is proposed in [14] by considering hybrid storage (two different storage technologies) within the same HPP. In [15], the total lifecycle cost (TLCC) of an HPP, consisting of RESs and hydrogen storage, is minimized, using heuristic optimization.…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 99%