The Quantitative Measurement of Organizational Culture in Health Care: A Review of the Available Instruments

Abstract

Objective. To review the quantitative instruments available to health service researchers who want to measure culture and cultural change. Data Sources. A literature search was conducted using Medline, Cinahl, Helmis, Psychlit, Dhdata, and the database of the King's Fund in London for articles published up to June 2001, using the phrase ''organizational culture.'' In addition, all citations and the gray literature were reviewed and advice was sought from experts in the field to identify instruments not found on the electronic databases. The search focused on instruments used to quantify culture with a track record, or potential for use, in health care settings. Data Extraction. For each instrument we examined the cultural dimensions addressed, the number of items for each questionnaire, the measurement scale adopted, examples of studies that had used the tool, the scientific properties of the instrument, and its strengths and limitations. Principal Findings. Thirteen instruments were found that satisfied our inclusion criteria, of which nine have a track record in studies involving health care organizations. The instruments varied considerably in terms of their grounding in theory, format, length, scope, and scientific properties. Conclusions. A range of instruments with differing characteristics are available to researchers interested in organizational culture, all of which have limitations in terms of their scope, ease of use, or scientific properties. The choice of instrument should be determined by how organizational culture is conceptualized by the research team, the purpose of the investigation, intended use of the results, and availability of resources.

Enhancing Leadership and Governance Competencies to Strengthen Health Systems in Nigeria: Assessment of Organizational Human Resources Development

“…It is difficult to build effective and cohesive teams and create a culture of shared learning and teamwork across an entire organization when obvious occupational barriers and status distinctions are in place. Yet effective communications and positive relationships between cadres of health workers have been linked to better performance in developed-country hospitals (Scott, Mannion et al, 2003).…”

Healthcare professional perspectives on quality and safety in New Zealand public hospitals: findings from a national survey

“…Given the complicated nature of the survey across 19 DHB, and several professional groups, the response rate could be considered good and certainly on a par with response rates in other complex fields. 9,23,45 The survey method also delivers only quantitative data. Although important for gauging perceptions and establishing a baseline against which to compare future studies, it could be useful to further investigate several of the issues raised above.…”

Changing practice to support self-management and recovery in mental illness: application of an implementation model

“…A further difficulty is in measuring the components of the available models. Measurement allows implementation leaders to identify barriers, and then to monitor progress in reducing these during a change project (Gagnon et al 2011;Emmons et al 2012;Finch et al 2012) but available survey tools have limited testing and unclear links with published change models (Scott et al 2003;Weiner et al 2008;Finch et al 2012 ).…”