2013
DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Quality of Consent - What is the Evidence?

Abstract: The documentation of consent is an important component of the clinical encounter. This study assesses the quality of documentation of that consent for a common surgical procedure, caesarean section, in an obstetric unit at a major teaching hospital and compares this quality between elective and emergency cases. There was a significant difference in the quality of documentation between the elective and emergency groups in some, but not all, categories assessed. Overall, the standard of consent documentation in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings confirm and expand previous evidence [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. The lack of informed consent is one of the typologies of mistreatment during childbirth [ 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings confirm and expand previous evidence [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. The lack of informed consent is one of the typologies of mistreatment during childbirth [ 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Many mothers experience birth only once in life, thus previous experience is limited. Effective communication can be challenged by many factors, including: the limited time available for discussion in emergency situations (e.g., emergency caesarean section, foetal and/or maternal complications), the possible influence of women’s pain, fatigue, and emotions and by the availability of standardised documents clarifying risks and benefits of procedures [ 18 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. When interpreting our results, therefore, we believe that it is important to avoid blaming health professionals for “low rates” of consent requests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, informing women may well not decrease the incidence of complications, although the women who subsequently suffer these complications would be expected to handle them much better, understanding they could occur. 13,15 Moreover, clearly the issue of written consent for natural vaginal delivery is an ongoing discussion nationally [7][8][9][10][11][12] and internationally. [16][17][18] Yet, the purely legal aspects may be somewhat beside the main point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding consent, there is ongoing disagreement between midwives and obstetricians, and between different obstetricians, on matters such as whether actual written consent is required for a 'natural' process. [7][8][9][10][11][12] One of the authors is a colorectal who also does occasional medicolegal reports, sometimes for colorectal complications of childbirth. Over the years it became clear there was a recurring theme in many of these women's experiences regarding the prenatal explanation of the risks of childbirth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In keeping with global trends, caesarean section rates in Australia and New Zealand have steadily increased from 19% in 1990 to 34% in 2016. Audits of consent for caesarean section have demonstrated deficiencies in the documentation of rare but significant risks such as hysterectomy, implications for the fetus such as respiratory morbidity and laceration or trauma, implications for future pregnancies, post‐operative pain and the associated difficulties with caring for a newborn baby …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%