1983
DOI: 10.1155/s1463924683000383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The quality control of measured data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the data ofthe numerical method (tables and 2), it can also be seen that the empirical variances of the ratio of the peak height is much smaller than that of the peak areas. This fact is in good agreement with previous investigations [8]. As a consequence, the use of the peak height ratio allows the detection of smaller autocorrelation-type measurement error components than would be possible in the case of the ratio of the peak areas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the data ofthe numerical method (tables and 2), it can also be seen that the empirical variances of the ratio of the peak height is much smaller than that of the peak areas. This fact is in good agreement with previous investigations [8]. As a consequence, the use of the peak height ratio allows the detection of smaller autocorrelation-type measurement error components than would be possible in the case of the ratio of the peak areas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…xt a0 + M't.+ a(t-_) + S*et. (8) Note that in almost all practical cases, the standard deviation of the random measurement error component (S) and the mean of the measurement error (a0 + M't) depend on the true value Xt:…”
Section: Materials and Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this instance, a need to control the properties and especially the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the random error component arises. We showed previously [6] by applying Monte Carlo methods that it is possible to estimate the standard deviation of the measured data using the statistics of the difference test. Our long-term practical experience has proved the high practical value of such control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%