2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience 2012
DOI: 10.1109/qomex.2012.6263846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The QoE alchemy: Turning quality into money. Experiences with a refined methodology for the evaluation of willingness-to-pay for service quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, most Perceived Quality ratings were above 4, in fact only in 63 cases the Perceived Quality of a video was rated lower than 4. As mentioned earlier, only two bitrate levels were used in our previous study; 600kbps of bitrate is considered as a reasonable video quality level that users are willing to pay for [33], while 2000kbps of bitrate is considered as the entry level of HD quality. As a result, participants from our previous study thought that the quality of the videos was reasonable in most cases.…”
Section: Dataset Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, most Perceived Quality ratings were above 4, in fact only in 63 cases the Perceived Quality of a video was rated lower than 4. As mentioned earlier, only two bitrate levels were used in our previous study; 600kbps of bitrate is considered as a reasonable video quality level that users are willing to pay for [33], while 2000kbps of bitrate is considered as the entry level of HD quality. As a result, participants from our previous study thought that the quality of the videos was reasonable in most cases.…”
Section: Dataset Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we briefly revisit an empirical work of [4] (experiment 1) and complement it with the new experiment 2 in order to analyze user perceptions and behaviors regarding varying network video qualities. While experiment 1 investigates the end users' WTP with active user decisions, experiment 2 in complementation assesses video quality ratings without active user decisions.…”
Section: Empirical Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more details about the procedure and the setup, please see [4]. A short overview about the setup is given in Figure 1, which depicts how the user can interact with the video streaming system regarding the selection of video contents and the purchasing of quality levels.…”
Section: A Experiments 1 -With User Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another higher-level characteristic that is often related to the viewing or hearing behaviors when consuming multimedia services, it is guided by the attention mechanism. Attention is a cognitive process of selectively concentrating on certain external objects (e.g., visual or auditory) while paying less or no attention to others [50]. Objects might be salient not only because of their characteristics but also because surrounding objects are not.…”
Section: High-levelmentioning
confidence: 99%