1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4601(1996)28:1<27::aid-kin4>3.0.co;2-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pyrolysis of CCl4 and C2Cl6 in the gas phase. Mechanistic modeling by thermodynamic and kinetic parameter estimation

Abstract: A detailed radical reaction mechanism is proposed to describe the thermal reactions of CCl4 and C2Cl6 in the gas phase quantitatively. A consistent set of activation energies and preexponential factors for all elementary reactions, in combination with enthalpies of formation and entropies for all species involved, is computer optimized to fit experimental pressure‐rise curves and concentration profiles. For this purpose new experimental results on the pyrolysis of CCl4 are used, together with published kinetic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…d Optimized [16,17], not optimized in [8]. e From simply described by a classical empirical rate equation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…d Optimized [16,17], not optimized in [8]. e From simply described by a classical empirical rate equation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was obtained using a combined simulationoptimization-reduction procedure from OPTKIN, starting from a larger model comprising all the known steps of the pyrolyses of CCl 4 and C 2 Cl 6 [8] together with Steps 2 and Ϫ2. Indeed, for the homogeneous thermal chlorination of CHCl 3 to CCl 4 under the experimental conditions of this work, CCl 4 is not stable.…”
Section: Numerical Modeling and Discussion Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, oxidation via HOCl and Cl 2 rival one another at high temperatures. The rate expressions for two additional reactions were plotted in Figure 4, i.e., HgCl + M T Hg + Cl + M 38 and Cl 2 + M T 2Cl + M. 39,40 Within each of these unimolecular reactions, M is the collision partner or gas bath, which does not participate chemically in the reactions, but is taken into account within the pressure-dependent kinetic predictions using RRKM theory. The depletion of HgCl as temperature decreases is faster than the three HgCl formation reactions, while (14) comparable to the formation reactions involving HOCl and Cl 2 at high temperatures.…”
Section: Data Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%