Motor Coordination 1981
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3884-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pyramidal Tract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 296 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, section 34 in Matelli et al, 1985). Previous architectonic studies have reported consistent medio-lateral variations in the size of layer V pyramids, with the largest ones found within the medial portion of the primary motor cortex (Stepniewska et al, 1993;Wiesendanger, 1981), and our present results confirm these observations. However, since cytoarchitectonic differences were accompanied by differences in laminar distribution patterns of multiple receptors, we defined the mesial portion of the primary motor cortex as a distinct region, i.e.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Subdivisions Of Macaque Motor and Psupporting
confidence: 91%
“…1, section 34 in Matelli et al, 1985). Previous architectonic studies have reported consistent medio-lateral variations in the size of layer V pyramids, with the largest ones found within the medial portion of the primary motor cortex (Stepniewska et al, 1993;Wiesendanger, 1981), and our present results confirm these observations. However, since cytoarchitectonic differences were accompanied by differences in laminar distribution patterns of multiple receptors, we defined the mesial portion of the primary motor cortex as a distinct region, i.e.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Subdivisions Of Macaque Motor and Psupporting
confidence: 91%
“…There were no significant differences in myelinated axon number between any of the 5 rostral sampling sites, although axon number was slightly higher in the rostral-most site. This may be explained by corticonuclear fibers leaving the pyramid as this does correspond to the region where the facial nucleus and nucleus ambiguous are located near the pons-medulla border (Zimmerman et al, 1964; Reh and Kalil, 1981; Wiesendanger, 1981; FitzGerald et al, 2007). Fewer axons were present at the caudal site (site 6), which is just rostral to the pyramidal decussation (p < 0.001); this is probably a reflection of the fact that CST axons are beginning to leave the pyramid to ascend dorsally and cross over prior to joining the dorsal CST in the spinal cord.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histological and imaging studies have shown massive shrinkage in the midbrain, pons, and pyramids after hemispheric lesions causing hemiparesis. 33,34 One patient, 14 examined more than 2 years after stroke, had a large cortical lesion with moderate motor deficit but no NAA loss from the capsule on the side of the lesion. Atrophy of the damaged motor pathways in this patient may have caused the volume originally occupied by the damaged pathways to be replaced by the surrounding normal tissue, resulting in no measured loss of NAA signal from the voxel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%