2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11266-018-0038-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pyramid of Nonprofit Responsibility: The Institutionalization of Organizational Responsibility Across Sectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
45
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Action repertoires are moulded by the opportunities and constraints provided by the nation-state, as corroborated by the study of protest groups (Tarrow 1996;Wada 2016). This observation also applies to non-profit organisations (Powell and DiMaggio 1992;Pope et al 2018), given that non-protest-oriented solidarity groups tend to adapt to the needs, funding opportunities and standard operating procedures established by the state (Minkoff and Powell 2006), meaning that organisational fields tend to adopt similar practices and streamline their activism accordingly.…”
Section: Internal Factors: Do the Activists' Experiences Organisatiomentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Action repertoires are moulded by the opportunities and constraints provided by the nation-state, as corroborated by the study of protest groups (Tarrow 1996;Wada 2016). This observation also applies to non-profit organisations (Powell and DiMaggio 1992;Pope et al 2018), given that non-protest-oriented solidarity groups tend to adapt to the needs, funding opportunities and standard operating procedures established by the state (Minkoff and Powell 2006), meaning that organisational fields tend to adopt similar practices and streamline their activism accordingly.…”
Section: Internal Factors: Do the Activists' Experiences Organisatiomentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, the variability of activities has its limits, given that citizen groups do not randomly make choices. On the contrary, research agrees that initiatives and organisations in the nonprofit and social movement sector adopt action repertoires in a purposeful, rational and even strategic manner (Rucht 1990;Pope et al 2018). Their choices are governed by different rationales, which are related to organisational missions and values.…”
Section: Internal Factors: Do the Activists' Experiences Organisatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of this membership environment therefore influence how these organizations are managed and their ultimate sustainability. While emerging research highlights the relevance of SR as a growing phenomenon within the nonprofit domain (e.g., Andreini et al, ; Lin‐Hi, Hörisch, & Blumberg, ; Pope et al, ; Zeimers et al, ), little is known about how these activities influence and shape a member's behavior toward a nonprofit organization.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SR embodies a broader philosophy of impact by and through an organization's discretionary activities (Carroll, , ) and requires organizations across all sectors to ensure that the totality of their actions are socially responsible and not just their primary program/area of interest (Vidal, Torres, Guix, & Rodríguez, ). Indeed, nonprofit organizations can be active agents of SR rather than merely recipients of corporate goodwill (Lee & Babiak, ; Pope, Bromley, Lim, & Meyer, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kemudian kedua ialah aspek relasi antar aktor/pemangku kepentingan. Aspek ini berfungsi untuk melihat hubungan dan interaksi yang terjadi antar aktor/pemangku kepentingan sebagai modal untuk memahami konsensus-konsensus yang terjadi dalam pencapaian tujuan (Pope, Bromley, Lim, & Meyer, 2018). Analisis berkaitan dengan relasi antar aktor/pemangku kepentingan terdiri dari: a. Kualitas relasi sebagai indikasi terhadap posisi pihak yang berkepentingan berderajat baik, sedang, buruk atau berkonflik; b. Kekuatan relasi, meliputi analisa terkait dengan frekuensi dan intensitas kontak; c. Formalitas relasi, berkaitan dengan intervensi dan dominasi dalam relasi; d. Ketergantungan antar pemangku kepentingan, merupakan analisis yang berkaitan dengan dengan derajat ketergantungan antar pihak yang berkepentingan dalam suatu relasi.…”
Section: Kerangka Teoriunclassified