2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0439-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The push for independence in Catalonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results, however, confirmed the stagnation though the formation of a new Regional interests. It must be recognized that that kind of discourse obtained a good reception (Crameri 2014(Crameri , 2015Minder 2017;Dowling 2018;Cardenal 2020), though there were cautions signalling towards the concomitant influence of top-down mechanisms rooted on a harsh political struggle between secessionist formations to lead the region (Barrio and Field 2018;Elliott 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results, however, confirmed the stagnation though the formation of a new Regional interests. It must be recognized that that kind of discourse obtained a good reception (Crameri 2014(Crameri , 2015Minder 2017;Dowling 2018;Cardenal 2020), though there were cautions signalling towards the concomitant influence of top-down mechanisms rooted on a harsh political struggle between secessionist formations to lead the region (Barrio and Field 2018;Elliott 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…he surge, rapid evolution and failed culmination of the recent secessionist attempt at Catalonia was a unique experiment in contemporary Western politics. It carried characteristic ingredients: (1) gigantic and iterated street demonstrations fueled by an unrelenting and skillful activism; (2) absence of a clear secessionist majority within the region; (3) strong impulse and direction given by a Regional Government and an Autonomous Parliament openly confronting Central Powers; (4) systematic pro-secession bias by public media controlled by Autonomous powers; (5) overwhelming social pressure by a continuous presence of secessionist symbols everywhere; (6) successful silencing of the majoritarian non-secessionist citizenry throughout most of the upsurge (Barrio and Field, 2018;Elliott, 2018). All that arising at one of the richest and more advanced Spanish regions, within a democratic context at the heart of the European Union.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plethora of interpretations (Amat, 2015(Amat, , 2017; Barrio and Field, 2018;Barceló-Soler, 2013;Boylan, 2015;Crameri, 2014Crameri, , 2015Coll et al, 2018;Cuadras-Morató and Rodon, 2018;Dowling, 2018;Elliot, 2018;Griffiths et al, 2015;Minder, 2017;Morel, 2018;Serrano, 2013), tried to explain the secessionist surge at Catalonia focusing mainly on economic and socio-political issues: a deep economic recession during the preceding years; irritation with malfunctioning and corruption of Spanish parties and institutions; arrogance and passivity of Spain's central government in front of a movement instigated by ambitious and discontent regional elites; weaknesses and inadequacies of the European Union. These factors surely contributed in varying degrees, though they left unexplained why they had uniquely combined within a single European region, to the point of triggering urgent demands for segregation, while similar tensions did not appear in other comparable Southern Europe regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They show that secessionist processes should not be taken for granted as citizen-led initiatives and it can be the political elites themselves who trigger and drive a secessionist process forward. 4 In both cases, referendums were unilaterally declared by the secessionist political elites, the processes were more top-down than bottom-up and the central governments declared them illegal. Moreover, in both cases the economic crises, high polarisation and the eventual collapse of the party system played a big role in perpetuating the independence bid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%