2011
DOI: 10.1080/01609513.2010.549640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Purpose, Benefits, and Challenges of “Check-in” in a Group-work Class

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to illustrate, through teaching examples and student logs, a technique, called "check-in" routinely used in the author's group-work classes. Check-in is a process where students are invited, in the beginning of each class, to share their struggles, questions, dilemmas, accomplishments, and failures related to their group-work learning. Check-in requires students to listen and offer support, ideas, challenges, and guidance to each other. The goal of check-in is to help students de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"Check-ins" also allowed group leaders to assess each member's general mental wellness, changes in mental status, and current urges to use alcohol or substances. The model used for "check-ins" was consistent with practice guidelines suggested by Clemans (2011), including establishing the norm of "check-ins" in each group session, having group leaders provide guidance on appropriate member disclosure during "check-in," and keeping "check-in" time limited. Although these guidelines were established for educational classes learning group work, it is noted they are relevant for conducting group therapy.…”
Section: Group Work In the Beginning Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Check-ins" also allowed group leaders to assess each member's general mental wellness, changes in mental status, and current urges to use alcohol or substances. The model used for "check-ins" was consistent with practice guidelines suggested by Clemans (2011), including establishing the norm of "check-ins" in each group session, having group leaders provide guidance on appropriate member disclosure during "check-in," and keeping "check-in" time limited. Although these guidelines were established for educational classes learning group work, it is noted they are relevant for conducting group therapy.…”
Section: Group Work In the Beginning Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "parallel process" as defined by Shulman (1987) and discussed by Knight (2000) is illustrated in the work of Clemans (2011), who utilized the technique of member check-in within the classroom. The use of the parallel process makes use of teaching group content while helping students process being a member of a classroom group.…”
Section: Group Work Education and Teaching Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teaching group work has been covered extensively in the literature (Berger, 1996;Birnbaum 1984;Clemans, 2011;Clements, 2008;Dennison, 2005;Ephross, 1989;Gitterman, 1988;Knight, 2000;Shulman, 1987), but this study adds to the literature as it provides direction for an alternative model for undergraduate social work students to learn group work skills. Clements (2011) found "learning by doing" to be effective among students enrolled in group work practice courses at a large, urban campus.…”
Section: Social Work Education and Group Work Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clemans (2011) highlighted components of check-in groups that contribute to their success, including peer validation and support as a part of the group process, helping students develop skills, and including everyone in the process. Having a welldefined process for each group session and a positive leader who believed in the purpose of the group were critical to the success of both approaches.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%