1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf00994048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pupillary response as an indicator of arousal and cognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
71
3
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
71
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that pupil size can be influenced by level of arousal or by cognitive load (Kahneman & Beatty, 1966;Libby et al, 1973;Tryon, 1975;Vo et al, 2008). Since ours was a passive viewing task that required no cognitive load, we interpret the change in pupil size as arousal (Bradley et al, 2008;Janisse, 1974;Partala & Surakka 2003;Stanners et al, 1979). Furthermore, Bradley et al (2008) reported that pupil dilation in response to arousing stimuli compared with neutral stimuli starts from about 2 s post stimulus onset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is known that pupil size can be influenced by level of arousal or by cognitive load (Kahneman & Beatty, 1966;Libby et al, 1973;Tryon, 1975;Vo et al, 2008). Since ours was a passive viewing task that required no cognitive load, we interpret the change in pupil size as arousal (Bradley et al, 2008;Janisse, 1974;Partala & Surakka 2003;Stanners et al, 1979). Furthermore, Bradley et al (2008) reported that pupil dilation in response to arousing stimuli compared with neutral stimuli starts from about 2 s post stimulus onset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This measure has recently been successfully employed in infant studies (Gredebäck & Melinder, 2010;Jackson & Sirois, 2009;Sirois & Jackson, 2012), although it has been used primarily to assess cognitive and affective information processing in adults (Kahneman & Beatty, 1966;Libby, Lacey, & Lacey, 1973;Tryon, 1975). Specifically, when cognitive load was minimal, pupils dilated to highly arousing stimuli, regardless of whether these were negative or positive (Bradley, Miccoli, Escrig, & Lang, 2008;Janisse, 1974;Partala & Surakka 2003;Stanners, Coulter, Sweet, & Murphy, 1979). In an unpublished preliminary study, we found that adults' pupils dilated more when they viewed impossible human arm movements than when they viewed possible ones, consistent with our work in which adults reported that viewing such stimuli was aversive (Morita et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is little doubt that pupillary response is a useful measure of variations in cognitive load, pupillary response is also found to be sensitive to confounding (or noisy) factors unrelated to the cognitive task, such as changes of illumination and emotional states [6][7][8]. Kramer [9] reported that larger changes in the pupil diameter occur in response to illumination changes than during information processing.…”
Section: Pupillary Response For Cognitive Load Measurementmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, research showed that variations in pupil diameter (PD) also respond significantly to cognitive and emotional stimuli [37,41,62]. Recent data suggests that the pupil's response is significantly modulated by emotional arousal regardless of hedonic valence [1,11].…”
Section: Physiological Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%