Reassessing the Role of Management in the Golden Age 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48722-9_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Public Sector and the Regime of Capital in India, 1947–1975

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The piecemeal process of economic liberalisation which, however "half-hearted" at first (Harriss 1987), entailed the gradual dismantling of the Nehru-Mahalanobis strategy of development that had marked the first few decades of post-Independence economic growth. The Nehru-Mahalanobis development model was rooted in the nationalist struggle for independence and aimed inter alia at creating selfsufficiency and an economy free from external and metropolitan domination (Gupta 2017). In this arrangement, much in line with how other newly independent states chose to organise their economies after World War II, the state played a decisive role to the extent that Kothari (2005, 37) has claimed that there was a consensus, from industrialists to left-of-centre politicians and radicals, on the conception of a positive and interventionist role for the state on behalf of the masses.…”
Section: Political Economy Of India's New Land Warsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The piecemeal process of economic liberalisation which, however "half-hearted" at first (Harriss 1987), entailed the gradual dismantling of the Nehru-Mahalanobis strategy of development that had marked the first few decades of post-Independence economic growth. The Nehru-Mahalanobis development model was rooted in the nationalist struggle for independence and aimed inter alia at creating selfsufficiency and an economy free from external and metropolitan domination (Gupta 2017). In this arrangement, much in line with how other newly independent states chose to organise their economies after World War II, the state played a decisive role to the extent that Kothari (2005, 37) has claimed that there was a consensus, from industrialists to left-of-centre politicians and radicals, on the conception of a positive and interventionist role for the state on behalf of the masses.…”
Section: Political Economy Of India's New Land Warsmentioning
confidence: 99%