2018
DOI: 10.3390/aerospace5020046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Public Safety Zones around Small and Medium Airports

Abstract: Proper planning around airports safeguards the surrounding territory from risks of air accidents. Many countries have defined Public Safety Zones (PSZs) beyond the runway thresholds as a result of targeted risk assessment methods. Therefore, national aviation Authorities could limit building construction and industrial development in order to contain the risk for dwellers to be involved in aircraft accidents. The number of people who live, work or congregate in these areas should be limited. The procedure to s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantitative risk assessment of runway veer-off has been carried out with a methodology inspired by the one developed by the Italian Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC) with University of Rome La Sapienza, based on assessing the risk deriving from aeronautical activities in surrounding areas of airports [23][24][25]. This methodology involves the creation of a structured set of methods and models to represent the risk through the product of the probability of occurrence with the damage severity.…”
Section: Analytical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative risk assessment of runway veer-off has been carried out with a methodology inspired by the one developed by the Italian Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC) with University of Rome La Sapienza, based on assessing the risk deriving from aeronautical activities in surrounding areas of airports [23][24][25]. This methodology involves the creation of a structured set of methods and models to represent the risk through the product of the probability of occurrence with the damage severity.…”
Section: Analytical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Element/defect i is along more than two-thirds of section length Given the above procedures, it is possible to simulate values of BIR s and define appropriate classes of risk. To this end, the authors considered six probabilistic classes of risk level, as usually done for transport infrastructure risk assessment [47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. The definition of ranges for each class requires a significant number of monitored branches.…”
Section: Continuousmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, different capacities can be determined as regards the weather conditions: optimal capacity (i.e., number of movements that can be managed in 1 h in optimal qualified conditions when a visual flight is possible) and reduced capacity (i.e., obtained for adverse weather conditions, especially for low visibility conditions, when the flight should be instrumental) [8]. Other factors affect the overall airport capacity [9]: the geometrical layout of the runway and taxiway systems, geometrical and logistic setup of the apron areas, the size and speed of expected aircraft, the approach and departure procedures [10], the procedures adopted by ATCO [11], the traffic routes and the air traffic management technologies, and the safety [12][13][14] and environmental procedures adopted to manage the traffic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%