2000
DOI: 10.1080/21650993.2000.9755824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Public's Acceptance of Restitution as a Sentencing Alternative in the United States and New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In studying how the public tends to view victim compensation for crimes, scholars have been primarily concerned with public acceptance for restitution , or the financial payment to victims by offenders , as a punishment alternative. Researchers have generally found broad public support for financial over carceral sanctions, both in the United States (e.g., Bae, , ; Doble, ; Doble and Klein, ; Knowles, ; Umbreit, ) and internationally (e.g., Boer and Sessar, ; Doob and Roberts, ; Galaway, , ). A general gap in this literature concerns how the public views victim compensation provided through government programs, rather than as part of an offender's sentence, as a policy option.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studying how the public tends to view victim compensation for crimes, scholars have been primarily concerned with public acceptance for restitution , or the financial payment to victims by offenders , as a punishment alternative. Researchers have generally found broad public support for financial over carceral sanctions, both in the United States (e.g., Bae, , ; Doble, ; Doble and Klein, ; Knowles, ; Umbreit, ) and internationally (e.g., Boer and Sessar, ; Doob and Roberts, ; Galaway, , ). A general gap in this literature concerns how the public views victim compensation provided through government programs, rather than as part of an offender's sentence, as a policy option.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%