Higher Education for the Public Good 2012
DOI: 10.18820/9781928357056/04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The public purposes of the university: a historical view, 1995-2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The introduction of democracy in 1994 led the reform of SA higher education institutions (HEIs) with "national political juncture and the macroeconomic policy" of the state that set out priori-ties for transformation of higher education (HE) (Lange, 2012). Two of the four priorities will be discussed in this article for context.…”
Section: Modern University Workplace In South Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The introduction of democracy in 1994 led the reform of SA higher education institutions (HEIs) with "national political juncture and the macroeconomic policy" of the state that set out priori-ties for transformation of higher education (HE) (Lange, 2012). Two of the four priorities will be discussed in this article for context.…”
Section: Modern University Workplace In South Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the priority focused on effectiveness and efficiency of HEIs. The HE White Paper clarified that "…effec-tiveness was the achievement of the desired outcomes, and efficiency referred to the lack of duplication and waste" (Lange, 2012). These two indicators led to the restructuring of the HE system via mergers and incorporations.…”
Section: Modern University Workplace In South Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining the periodisations of South African Higher Education policy developments proposed by Muller, Maassen & Cloete (2006), Badat (2009) and Lange (2012), Lange & Luescher-Mamashela (2016:112) propose the following three periods, with brief description of the defining characteristics of each in terms of policy development at system and institutional levels. …”
Section: Four Periods In Higher Education Policy Development In Southmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Browne report -commissioned by the New Labour government -moves decisively away from the principle that governments should support universities to provide access at the highest level to the full range of human knowledge, understanding and creativity and to ensure that young people have the opportunity to develop their full intellectual and creative potential, regardless of family wealth. In its place comes a much cruder principle that the only university functions government supports are those that meet the immediate needs of the economy ... Lange (2012) se oorsig van die hervormingsinisiatiewe in hoër onderwys ná 1994 is besonder insiggewend vir die Suid-Afrikaanse konteks. Sy sonder vier hoofprioriteite van hierdie proses uit, en drie hiervan, naamlik "doeltreffendheid en effektiwiteit", "kwaliteitsbeheer" en "ontwikkeling", hou verband met groter aandrang van die regering op ekonomiese bydraes deur universiteite, hoewel, soos Lange aandui, dit nie altyd onmiddellik duidelik is uit die benoemings van die hervormingsprioriteite as sodanig nie.…”
Section: Dualiteitmentioning
confidence: 99%