1956
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330140218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pterion in the Australian aborigine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
71
2
7

Year Published

1968
1968
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
8
71
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The morphological variability of pterion has been documented in various populations (Murphy;Ahuja et al;Agarwal et al;Matsumura et al;Lee et al 2001;Saxena et al;Ersoy et al;Oguz et al;Mwachaka et al;Zalawadia et al;Natekar et al;Seema & Mahajan;Eboh & Obaroefe). Basically, the patterns of pterion have been classified into 4 types: spheno-parietal, fronto-temporal, stellate, and epipteric types (Seema & Mahajan).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The morphological variability of pterion has been documented in various populations (Murphy;Ahuja et al;Agarwal et al;Matsumura et al;Lee et al 2001;Saxena et al;Ersoy et al;Oguz et al;Mwachaka et al;Zalawadia et al;Natekar et al;Seema & Mahajan;Eboh & Obaroefe). Basically, the patterns of pterion have been classified into 4 types: spheno-parietal, fronto-temporal, stellate, and epipteric types (Seema & Mahajan).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the types and positions of the ptrion have been well reported to be varying in different races (Morales et al, 2011). Previously, the patterns of pterion have been documented in various populations including Australian Aborigines (Murphy, 1956), Indians (Ahuja et al, 1971;Saxena et al, 2003;Natekar et al, 2010), North Indians (Agarwal et al, 1980;Seema & Mahajan, 2014), Japanese (Matsumura et al, 1991), Turks (Ersoy et al, 2003), Turkish (Oguz et al, 2004), Kenyas (Mwachaka et al, 2009), Gujurat (Zalawadia et al, 2010, Koreans (Lee et al, 2001), and Nigerians (Eboh and Obaroefe, 2014;Asala and Mbajiorgu, 1996). Although an incidence about skull morphology like the metopism, a rare variant suture persistence, in Northeastern Thais has been previously documented (Khamanarong et al, 2015), there is no later report about classification of pterion formation in our population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interaction of underlying duramater with the developing calvarial bones has been demonstrated experimentally in rabbit showing that the dura not only promotes the position and maintenance of sutures, but also duramater can re-pattern both the appearance and position of the bones and sutures of the cranial vault after removal of calvaria in the neonate Opperman et al (1993). Other authors believe that sutural bones develop from normal processes and are genetically determined Murphy (1956), Pal & Routal (1986). The MSX2 gene, which encodes a home domain, transcription factor plays a crucial role in craniofacial morphogenesis by influencing fusion of sutures (Liu et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These descriptive statistics reveal interspecific and sex differences suggesting that genetic variation underlies, at least in part, pterion sutural pattern variation. However, considerations of familial inheritance that contribute to this variation have generally not been addressed beyond noting that the observed variation is likely a result of a combination of environmental and genetic factors (Murphy, 1956). Aiello and Dean (1990) concluded that little phylogenetic significance could be attached to variation in the region of the pterion as several sutural patterns occur in all extant hominoids, and Asala and Mbajiorgu (1996) concluded simply that these variations are ''epigenetic.''…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%