2000
DOI: 10.1177/0145482x0009401104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Psychotherapeutic Use of Benign Hallucinations with Persons with Charles Bonnet Syndrome

Abstract: This article supports the view that the “pseudohallucinations” of Charles Bonnet syndrome are related to vision loss, not to psychosis. It proposes that the symbolic content of the images can be used to facilitate the psychosocial adaptation to the loss of vision, just as the interpretation of dreams does for sighted people in psychotherapeutic treatment, and presents several clinical vignettes to illustrate this point.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the individual responds positively additional questions follow in an attempt to determine the type of visual experience, for example, “What image did you see?” (Menon, 2005). These are followed up with statements asking the individual to describe what they saw, whether the image was static or dynamic, how the individual felt about the visions, and whether or not they have disclosed having hallucinations to others (Menon, 2005; Wagner-Lampl & Oliver, 2000). Participants were assigned to the CBS group if they answered yes to any of the above questions while those answering no to all questions were assigned to the non-CBS group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the individual responds positively additional questions follow in an attempt to determine the type of visual experience, for example, “What image did you see?” (Menon, 2005). These are followed up with statements asking the individual to describe what they saw, whether the image was static or dynamic, how the individual felt about the visions, and whether or not they have disclosed having hallucinations to others (Menon, 2005; Wagner-Lampl & Oliver, 2000). Participants were assigned to the CBS group if they answered yes to any of the above questions while those answering no to all questions were assigned to the non-CBS group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%