2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The psychostimulant modafinil facilitates water maze performance and augments synaptic potentiation in dentate gyrus

Abstract: , S.M. The psychostimulant modafinil facilitates water maze performance and augments synaptic potentiation in dentate gyrus, Neuropharmacology (2010Neuropharmacology ( ), doi: 10.1016Neuropharmacology ( /j.neuropharm.2010 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(86 reference statements)
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fronto-cortical activation is also consistent with the improved cognitive performance observed in rodent behavioral tasks upon MOD administration at doses similar to those employed in the present study (Tsanov et al, 2007;Beracochea et al, 2001Beracochea et al, , 2003Dawson et al, 2010). Consistent with the notion that fronto-cortical cognitive tasks are subserved by an extensively interconnected network of regions (reviewed by Mesulam, 1990), additional brain substrates activated by MOD may have a role in the pro-cognitive action of the drug.…”
Section: Functional Response To Modsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The fronto-cortical activation is also consistent with the improved cognitive performance observed in rodent behavioral tasks upon MOD administration at doses similar to those employed in the present study (Tsanov et al, 2007;Beracochea et al, 2001Beracochea et al, , 2003Dawson et al, 2010). Consistent with the notion that fronto-cortical cognitive tasks are subserved by an extensively interconnected network of regions (reviewed by Mesulam, 1990), additional brain substrates activated by MOD may have a role in the pro-cognitive action of the drug.…”
Section: Functional Response To Modsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These findings suggest that the pre-training acute administration of MOD promoted emotional memory deficits in an inverted-U shape fashion. Notwithstanding our findings are not in agreement with previous studies in rodents (Béracochéa et al, 2001(Béracochéa et al, , 2002(Béracochéa et al, , 2003(Béracochéa et al, , 2008Morgan et al, 2007;Piérard et al, 2006Piérard et al, , 2007Piérard et al, , 2011Tsanov et al, 2010;Ward et al, 2004), but they seem to be in line with other studies describing no effects (Waters et al, 2005) or even MOD-induced deleterious effects (Burgos et al, 2010;Shuman et al, 2009) on memory. In this way, Shuman et al (2009) have verified that pre-training 75 mg/kg MOD disrupted contextual-fear whereas it did not impair cued-fear conditioning or benefitted performance of mice in the Morris water maze.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…The notion is supported by preclinical evidence showing that modafinil, through increased dopaminergic and noradrenergic transmission, promotes adult neurogenesis, especially within the hippocampus (Brandt et al, 2014). Furthermore, in preclinical models, modafinil has been shown to improve spatial learning and fear conditioning, inhibitory control, WM functioning, and sustained attention (Morgan et al, 2007; Shuman et al, 2009; Tsanov et al, 2010). Our studies provide some FC evidence that corroborates the hypothesis that modafinil may interfere with some of these cognitive domains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in preclinical settings, the drug has been shown to promote hippocampal neurogenesis (Brandt et al, 2014) and synaptic plasticity (Rao et al, 2007; Tsanov et al, 2010). Overall, this psychostimulant has been viewed as a CED with lower risks of inducing addiction and a favorable side effect profile (Malcolm et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%