2013
DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2013.823618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Psychophysiology of Social Action: Facial Electromyographic Responses to Stigmatized Groups Predict Antidiscrimination Action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social psychological research has found that implicit stereotypes—spontaneous, awareness‐independent associations between social groups and certain traits (Hahn & Goedderz, 2020)—can predict an array of tangible critical outcomes, ranging from inequity in employers' decisions about employee raises and promotions to the potentially tragic consequences of police officers' split‐second “shoot‐don't shoot” judgments (Greenwald et al, 2015; Kahn & Davies, 2011; Latu et al, 2015; Spencer et al, 2016; Streeter, 2019). These spontaneous biases can also impact majority group members' likelihood of engaging in antidiscrimination and antiviolence activism (Stewart et al, 2013). Thus, it is not surprising that a goal of many intergroup relations researchers and practitioners is to identify effective and long‐lasting strategies to combat implicit biases in intergroup judgments and interactions (Kawakami et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social psychological research has found that implicit stereotypes—spontaneous, awareness‐independent associations between social groups and certain traits (Hahn & Goedderz, 2020)—can predict an array of tangible critical outcomes, ranging from inequity in employers' decisions about employee raises and promotions to the potentially tragic consequences of police officers' split‐second “shoot‐don't shoot” judgments (Greenwald et al, 2015; Kahn & Davies, 2011; Latu et al, 2015; Spencer et al, 2016; Streeter, 2019). These spontaneous biases can also impact majority group members' likelihood of engaging in antidiscrimination and antiviolence activism (Stewart et al, 2013). Thus, it is not surprising that a goal of many intergroup relations researchers and practitioners is to identify effective and long‐lasting strategies to combat implicit biases in intergroup judgments and interactions (Kawakami et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when experimentally induced to justify hostility toward these outgroups, participants' self-reported attitudes aligned with the negative fEMG activity. Similarly, Stewart et al (2003) found no correlation between fEMG activity in response to interactions involving gay men and participants' self-reported attitudes toward gay men. Interestingly, corrugator activity (measuring disgust) predicted antidiscrimination behaviors, whereas self-reported attitudes did not.…”
Section: What Is Femg?mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In another study, Stewart et al (2003) examined prejudice towards stigmatized groups, and found no correlation between fEMG activity in response to watching interactions of gay men and self-reported attitudes towards gay men.…”
Section: Alignment Between Self-reports and Unconscious Measuresmentioning
confidence: 96%