The Psychophysical Assessment of Odor Valence: Does an Anchor Stimulus Influence the Hedonic Evaluation of Odors?

Abstract

Olfactory stimuli are experienced primarily in terms of their hedonic tone and the assessment of olfactory hedonic estimates is a prevalent task in scientific and industrial contexts. However, measuring conditions are poorly standardized. Our study aims to fill this gap, focusing on the influence of anchor stimuli on olfactory hedonic evaluations, frequency of anchor presentation, and temporal stability of results. In n = 31 subjects, hedonic estimates for the 16 odors of the Sniffin' Sticks identification task were assessed on a visual analog rating scale under 4 measuring conditions (nonanchor, pleasant anchor, neutral anchor, unpleasant anchor). To test for stability over time, n = 10 subjects were reassessed 2, 4, and 6 months after original testing. To analyze for possible effects of single versus repeated anchor presentation, n = 15 subjects were retested 2 months after the original session in a multiple anchor presentation format. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the 4 anchor conditions, thus highlighting the necessity of specifying assessment methods in scientific research. No significant differences between timepoints were observed, indicating a high temporal stability of olfactory hedonic evaluations, especially from timepoint T2 onward. No overall significant effects of single versus multiple anchor presentation were detected. Findings might help to further standardize testing procedures.

Sex Differences in Odor Hedonic Perception: An Overview

“…Moreover, most of studies focus on several parameters and rarely only on hedonic estimation. Thus, the odorants, tasks and participant characteristics are generally heterogeneous from one study to another ( Clepce et al, 2014 ) which induces discrepancies and makes an overall conclusion difficult.…”

Decoding of Context-Dependent Olfactory Behavior in Drosophila

“…Flies, for example, choose the less aversive odor when forced to make a choice between two inherently aversive stimuli (Tully and Quinn, 1985). Moreover, studies in humans have shown that the evaluation of relative odor valence changes depending on the context (Clepce et al, 2014). How relative valence is computed in the brain and how it is modulated according to the context remains elusive, although a recent study showed that divisive normalization can explain context-dependent choice behavior in primates (Louie et al, 2013).…”

The Effect of Colour on the Anchoring Heuristic in Consumer Decision Making

“…This means that the participants' numeric estimation was affected by the anchor, the roulette ball number. Later studies also confirmed the effect of an anchoring (Hess & Orbe 2013;Loschelder, Stuppi, & Trötschel, 2013;Clepce, Neumann, Martus, Nitsch, Wielopolski, Koch, Kornhuber, Reich, & Thuerauf, 2014). That is to say, when people try to answer a question that they do not know the answer to, they tend to be affected either consciously or subconsciously by the anchor, which is not related to the question.…”