2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The psychometric validation of the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) in patients with bipolar disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
91
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
14
91
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To account for previously identified issues related to the SDS work score (Arbuckle et al., 2009; Coles et al., 2014; i.e, missing patient values due to unemployment during the study), sensitivity analyses were conducted in which scores on this individual item were calculated using three methods: (A) worst case I (“Case Report Form [CRF] Worst Case Score”, where work‐related information within the CRF is used to impute a missing work score); (B) imputed average non‐missing score (“Imputed Average Score”, where the average of the two available items—social and family—is used to impute the missing work item); and (C) worst case II (“Assumed Worst Case Score”, where a worst case score of 10 is assumed and imputed for all missing work items). Method A did not provide any additional information since no imputations were made with this rule in the entire database; therefore, it was identical to the nonimputation method used for the primary meta‐analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for previously identified issues related to the SDS work score (Arbuckle et al., 2009; Coles et al., 2014; i.e, missing patient values due to unemployment during the study), sensitivity analyses were conducted in which scores on this individual item were calculated using three methods: (A) worst case I (“Case Report Form [CRF] Worst Case Score”, where work‐related information within the CRF is used to impute a missing work score); (B) imputed average non‐missing score (“Imputed Average Score”, where the average of the two available items—social and family—is used to impute the missing work item); and (C) worst case II (“Assumed Worst Case Score”, where a worst case score of 10 is assumed and imputed for all missing work items). Method A did not provide any additional information since no imputations were made with this rule in the entire database; therefore, it was identical to the nonimputation method used for the primary meta‐analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…74, Nineteen studies 74,97,98,[102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117] contained data on the SF-36, one study involved the SF-12 101 and four studies [98][99][100][101] contained data on the EQ-5D. No studies were identified that examined the SF-6D in individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder.…”
Section: Bipolar Disordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What evidence there is on the EQ-5D is mixed, with three tests supporting the validity of the EQ-5D in this group and three against it across four studies. [98][99][100][101] …”
Section: Bipolar Disordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cronbach's alpha of SDS scale in this study is .84, showing good internal reliability similar to that of previous studies. 29 The Q-LES-Q is a self-reporting questionnaire composed of 93 items, 91 of which can be subdivided into 8 summary scales. The general activities subscale, which was used in this study, is often used as a short form for the Q-LES-Q.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%