The psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Personality Inventory for <scp>DSM</scp>‐5

Pires, Rute; Ferreira, Ana Sousa; Guedes, David

doi:10.1111/sjop.12383

Cited by 19 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 27 publications

(59 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Third, considerable evidence has accumulated in favor of the hypothesis that the PID-5 trait domains can be conceived of as maladaptive variants of general personality traits [77,84,144,149,152,165,168,[173][174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181][182]. Specifically, negative affectivity was consistently associated with low emotional stability, detachment with low extraversion, antagonism with low agreeableness, and disinhibition with low conscientiousness.…”

Section: Convergent Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, maladaptive traits have been found to be associated with a range of other variables, including age [75]; gender [75,217]; general symptom distress [66,77,84,172,[218][219][220]; psychotic disorder [221,222]; dissociative experiences [223]; bipolar disorder [224]; attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [225]; problematic alcohol use [66, 226•]; substance use [140,227,228]; self-harm [229]; pathological gambling [230]; internet-gaming disorder [231]; problematic internet use [223]; posttraumatic stress disorder [232, 233•]; physical illness [233•]; disability [57, [234][235][236]; quality of life [149,236]; self-esteem [150]; alexithymia [150]; empathy, self-reflection, and insight [150]; maladaptive schemas [237]; interpersonal problems [150,238,239]; pathological beliefs [240]; defensive styles [241]; emotion dysregulation [150,242]; anxiety mindset [205]; impulsivity [227]; aggression…”

Section: Convergent Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders

Zimmermann

Kerber

Kappelmann

et al. 2019

Curr Psychiatry Rep

249

212

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of Review Both the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) and the chapter on personality disorders (PD) in the recent version of ICD-11 embody a shift from a categorical to a dimensional paradigm for the classification of PD. We describe these new models, summarize available measures, and provide a comprehensive review of research on the AMPD. Recent Findings A total of 237 publications on severity (criterion A) and maladaptive traits (criterion B) of the AMPD indicate (a) acceptable interrater reliability, (b) largely consistent latent structures, (c) substantial convergence with a range of theoretically and clinically relevant external measures, and (d) some evidence for incremental validity when controlling for categorical PD diagnoses. However, measures of criterion A and B are highly correlated, which poses conceptual challenges. Summary The AMPD has stimulated extensive research with promising findings. We highlight open questions and provide recommendations for future research.

show abstract

Section: Convergent Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Convergent Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders

Zimmermann

Kerber

Kappelmann

et al. 2019

Curr Psychiatry Rep

249

212

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The PID-5 psychometric properties have been extensively examined and review studies have consistently shown it to be a reliable measure with internal consistency coefficients ranging from acceptable at the trait facets level to high at the domain trait level [ 7 ], and with the ability to capture individual differences that were stable during four weeks up to four months intervals [ 8 , 9 ]. Furthermore, in regards to its factor structure, the PID-5 confirmed a five-factor structure similar to the Five Factor Model (FFM), both in clinical and non-clinical studies and across different countries [ 10 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The PID-5 has been translated into different languages and cultures and can be found in Arabic [ 23 ], Czech [ 24 ], Danish [ 25 ], Dutch [ 26 ], French [ 27 ], German [ 28 ], Indonesian [ 29 ], Italian [ 30 ], Norwegian [ 31 ], Persian [ 32 ], Polish [ 33 ], Portuguese [ 8 ], Brazilian-Portuguese [ 34 ], Russian [ 35 ], Spanish [ 36 ], and Swedish [ 37 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Arabic Version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Community Sample of United Arab Emirates Nationals

Coelho¹,

Pires²,

Ferreira³

et al. 2020

CPEMH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Section III of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) proposes a model for conceptualizing personality disorders in which they are characterized by impairments in personality functioning and maladaptive personality traits. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) is a self-report measure that assesses the presence and severity of these maladaptive personality traits. Objective: The current study examined the reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) to measure maladaptive personality traits in the Emirati population of the United Arab Emirates. Methods: The Arabic version of the PID-5 was administered to a community sample of 1,090 United Arab Emirates nationals (89.5% female and 10.5% male, mean age = 22.44 years old). The descriptive measures, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity with NEO – Five Factor Inventory, as well as PID-5’s factor structure, were all addressed. Results: The PID-5facets and domains mean scores were higher in the Emirati sample compared to the original US sample. Internal consistency of the PID-5 scales was acceptable to high and test-retest coefficients ranged from 0.84 (facets) to 0.87 (domains). As expected, the five domains of the Arabic version of the PID-5 correlated significantly with all Five-Factor Model domains of personality. Additionally, the Arabic version of the PID-5 confirmed a five-factor structure that resembles the PID-5 domains. Conclusion: The findings of this study provided initial support for the use of the Arabic version of the PID-5 to assess maladaptive personality traits in the Emirati population of the United Arab Emirates.

show abstract

“…Bach und Presnall-Shvorin 2020). Die postulierten DSM-5 und ICD-11 Trait-Domänen scheinen jedenfalls immer wieder empirisch erhärtet werden zu können und wurden auch in verschiedenen Kulturen repliziert (Bach et al 2017;Lotfi et al 2018;Pires et al 2017). Es gibt aber auch viele kritische Stimmen wie Paris (2020), der zwar grundsätzlich die Entwicklung begrüßt, jedoch Jahrzehnte von Forschung in Gefahr oder sogar verloren sieht.…”

Section: üBersichtsarbeit Paradigmenwechsel In Der Icd-11: Dimensionaunclassified

Die „neue“ Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung: Dimensionale Klassifikation im DSM-5 und ICD-11

Mitmansgruber

2020

Psychotherapie Forum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zusammenfassung Die jahrzehntelange und zunehmende Unzufriedenheit mit der bisherigen kategorialen Klassifikation der Persönlichkeitsstörungen (PS) im amerikanischen DSM-IV und in der ICD-10 der Weltgesundheitsorganisation hat u. a. mit fehlender empirischer Unterstützung vieler Kategorien, der sehr hohen Komorbidität der PS untereinander oder der großen Heterogenität von Symptomen innerhalb einer Diagnose zu tun. Sie hat in den letzten Revisionen der beiden Diagnosesysteme einen radikalen Wandel hin zu einem dimensionalen Klassifikationssystem unterstützt, das um vieles stärker in der empirischen psychologischen Forschung abgesichert ist. Im DSM‑5 ist die Revolution ausgeblieben, weil das dimensionale Modell im Anhang verblieben ist, während die alte DSM-IV-Klassifikation unverändert übernommen wurde. Allerdings hat dieses „Alternative Modell der Persönlichkeitsstörungen“ (AMPD) seit seiner Publikation erhebliches Forschungsinteresse erfahren. In der ICD-11 ist eine dimensionale Einschätzung der Persönlichkeit auf den 5 Domänen „Negative Affectivity“, „Detachment“, „Dissociality“, „Disinhibition“ und „Anankastia“ als radikale Alternative zu den 10 bisherigen Kategorien bereits abgesegnet und wird ab 2022 weltweit die Diagnosestellung verändern. Während hier zunächst alle bisherigen Kategorien eliminiert wurden, erreichten kritische Stimmen am Ende, dass die Borderline-Störung als einziger Qualifier in der ICD-11 erhalten bleibt. Die beiden Systeme werden in ihren zentralen Annahmen und im praktischen Vorgehen beleuchtet. Die Diskussionen und die bisherige empirische Befundlage zu den Dimensionen und der klinischen Nützlichkeit für Praktiker*innen werden zusammengefasst.

show abstract

The psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Personality Inventory for DSM‐5

Cited by 19 publications

References 27 publications

A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders

A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders

Arabic Version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Community Sample of United Arab Emirates Nationals

Die „neue“ Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung: Dimensionale Klassifikation im DSM-5 und ICD-11

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About