The psychology of ustoychivost': a conceptual model of human ustoychivost'

The article examines the features of the expression of psycho-emotional conflict within a person within the framework of external and internal loci of control through the creation of graphic art objects. The authors argue that communicative strategies for resolving problems in stressful situations and seeking social support are associated with the question of the individual's ability to independently solve emerging problem situations and find internal resources to overcome them by releasing psychoemotional stress, based on the structure of the cognitive sphere of a person, the characteristics of his perception and thinking. Typical external semantics of graffiti consists in an attempt to convince others of the hopelessness of being. The internal locus of control is associated with the conceptual sphere of social activity and is embodied in a wide variety of imperative forms, including a call, order, request, advice, and so on. In other words, the psycho-hermeneutics of graffiti is conditioned, on the one hand, by communicative and pragmatic strategies of social empathy (internal locus of control), and, on the other hand, by the conflict of the individual with society and the desire for spiritual and moral escapism, escape from reality to self-isolation and loneliness (external locus of control). The study proposes a classification of graphic art objects, which is based on the form of public expression of the individual's inner world, which is associated with the implementation of the compensatory-pragmatic function of graffiti as a universal code of modern urban communication.

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychohermeneutics of graffiti: external and internal loci of control

Kolmakova

Shalkov

2021

“…In psychology operate words "sustainability", "stability", "resilience", "resistance". In Europe and America, psychologists use the words "stability" or "resistance" or "resilience", which translate into Russian as "ustoychivost '", and, conversely, depending on the context [2]. For understanding of material of article, a words "sustainability", "stability", "ustoychivost'", "resilience", "resistance", is designated by a uniform symbol -Ω.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The golden scale psychology sustainability, algorithm use at a research

Kazankov

2021

Self Cite

The article presents the author’s approach to understanding research of a person sustainability. In modern psychology, there is no methodology for numerically assessing human sustainability. The article presents an algorithm for using the scale GSP-Ω. GSP-Ω - the Golden Scale Psychology Sustainability. Options of use of a scale GSP-Ω are analyzed. The applicability of the scale GSP-Ω for different age categories of people, considering their profession and gender, is considered. This scale GSP-Ω has a high validity for use in assessing the sustainability of a person aged 10 years and older, which is an important factor for a psychologist. The simplicity of scale GSP-Ω use in different conditions (field and lab) is empirically proved. The article discusses three research hypotheses and briefly describes modern methods for assessing sustainability. The article assumes that the scale can be used by psychologists for different professions. However, she it is most relevant for professions related to stress.

Matrix of sustainability of the person

Kazankov

2021

Self Cite

In article the matrix of an algorithm of a research of sustainability of the person is provided. 125 terms characterizing sustainability of the person are taken as a basis. Two hypotheses are for this purpose formulated. The first hypothesis tells about lack of a uniform paradigm of studying a phenomenon sustainability. The second hypothesis approves a possible general way of a research of a phenomenon of sustainability of the person in psychology. In article the factor model of sustainability of the person defining approach to formulation of a matrix is provided. Follows from a matrix that methods of the analysis and diagnostics must show numerical value of sustainability of the person. In a matrix factors of psychophysiological, psychological and psychosocial levels of living and human activity are put. Therefore, in article it is told about psychophysiological, psychological and psychosocial sustainability. They form the general sustainability of the person. In article the author suggests entering a uniform symbol of designation of sustainability of the person - Ω. In the conclusion of article, the author suggests combining efforts for forming of uniform approach in a research of a phenomenon of sustainability of the person.