2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The psychology of online activism and social movements: relations between online and offline collective action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
44
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This measure was not an “active” measure of online involvement with the Yellow Vest movement (e.g., sharing/liking Yellow Vest political posts or news). Indeed, to the extent that seemingly trivial online behaviors could be considered as online activism, we opted for using “passive” measures of news uptake to avoid confounding with our outcome variable (i.e., offline activism, see Greijdanus et al., 2020).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure was not an “active” measure of online involvement with the Yellow Vest movement (e.g., sharing/liking Yellow Vest political posts or news). Indeed, to the extent that seemingly trivial online behaviors could be considered as online activism, we opted for using “passive” measures of news uptake to avoid confounding with our outcome variable (i.e., offline activism, see Greijdanus et al., 2020).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…‘annoyed’, ‘angry’, and ‘stupid’), with relative frequencies being interpreted as regional levels of hostility on social media. The LIWC measures of anger and swearing were used previously for assessing hostility (Hancock, Woodworth, & Boochever, 2018; Ksiazek, 2015; Matsumoto, Hwang, & Frank, 2016). While we believe that the validation procedures for the hostility measures should generally be conducted on the individual level (see citations), we ascertain their validity on the collective level in the Supporting Information (see file ‘validity of hostility measure.R’).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that the reverse effect, offline behaviour affecting online behaviour, has also been observed across a range of studies and that the order and interaction of both spheres are ongoing issues of debate (e.g. Greijdanus et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social media platforms enable online social cohesion by offering distributed information-gathering and realtime information dissemination. Given its accessibility and proficiency as an information exchange tool, Twitter has provided social and political activists an opportunity to complement [8], and not hinder participation in [9,10], real-world social mobilization. During the 2012 Italian protests for global economic change, tweeting was determined to be more effective locally in discussing real-world, real-time events than traditional mainstream media platforms [11].…”
Section: Social Media and Social Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RR was consistently below chance for the 29th-39th windows. DET showed aboveor nearly above-chance values in windows [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%