1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7358(97)00047-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Psychology of Cosmetic Surgery: A Review and Reconceptualization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
151
2
11

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 295 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
12
151
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Consideration of surgery was impacted by women's pre-existing appearance selfdiscrepancies, which is consistent with the proposal that individuals with a low appearance evaluation are likely to consider surgery to a larger extent than those who are relatively satisfied with their looks (Sarwer, Wadden, Pertschuk, & Whitaker, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Consideration of surgery was impacted by women's pre-existing appearance selfdiscrepancies, which is consistent with the proposal that individuals with a low appearance evaluation are likely to consider surgery to a larger extent than those who are relatively satisfied with their looks (Sarwer, Wadden, Pertschuk, & Whitaker, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This is significantly higher than the 1.5%, being the probable prevalence rate of BDD within the general population (6,18). On the other hand, the rate of probable BDD found among the patients attending the cosmetic dental clinics in the present study appears to be much lower than the 7 to 8 percent generally reported among cosmetic surgery and dermatology populations (10,19). However, when compared to the rates reported in the few studies on patients presenting for other types of non-surgical cosmetic procedures, such as Botox injections and chemical peels, the proportion of patients meeting all diagnostic criteria of BDD in the present study is higher.…”
Section: Figure I About Here Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Sarwer, Wadden, Pertschuk, and Whitaker (1998b) introduced a theoretical model of the relationship between body image and cosmetic surgery (figure 1).…”
Section: Why Cosmetic Surgery?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body image valence is the measure of the importance of body image to one's self-esteem whereas body image value entails the degree to which one is satisfied or not with one's appearance. The interaction between both factors determines whether or not cosmetic surgery is considered or undergone (Sarwer et al, 1998b). According to the model, only people whose self-esteem greatly depends on body image (positive body image valence) and who are highly dissatisfied with their body image (low body image value) will consider cosmetic surgery.…”
Section: Why Cosmetic Surgery?mentioning
confidence: 99%