2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2008.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The psychology of AMBER Alert: Unresolved issues and implications

Abstract: mandatory-influenzavaccinations-an-example-of-health-promotion-theater/ Miller, M. K., Alvarez, M., & Weaver, J. ( 2016). Empirical evidence for AMBER Alert as crime control theater: A comparison of student and community samples. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most alerts are issued not in cases of stranger abductions; instead, most are issued in cases of family abductions, in which the likelihood of bodily injury or death is low (Griffin et al, 2007). M. K. Miller et al (2009) further suggest that some alerts may be issued without enough descriptive information to aid in the successful return of the child.…”
Section: Amber Alertmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most alerts are issued not in cases of stranger abductions; instead, most are issued in cases of family abductions, in which the likelihood of bodily injury or death is low (Griffin et al, 2007). M. K. Miller et al (2009) further suggest that some alerts may be issued without enough descriptive information to aid in the successful return of the child.…”
Section: Amber Alertmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The U.S. Department of Justice (2006) claims that AMBER Alerts have saved hundreds of children's lives, and the system enjoys the near unanimous support of the public, policy makers, and law enforcement. Yet evidence suggests that the system may be ineffective (Griffin, Miller, Hoppe, Rebideaux, & Hammack, 2007;Harder, Bloomfield, & Chihak, 2003), and researchers have proposed that AMBER Alerts may have serious unintended consequences (Griffin & Miller, 2008;M. K. Miller, Griffin, Clinkenbeard, & Thomas, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may prove consequential as participants were unable to be prevented from taking notes if they had wished during the task which would have significantly influenced the recall accuracy and error scores. However, the study aimed to replicable realistic events in daily activities and research has demonstrated how members of the public are unlikely to give 100% of their attention and concentration to every appeal presented (Miller et al, 2009). Similarly, these individuals may be distracted by completing alternative tasks at the same time as the appeal such as eating a family meal which would not have been possible to achieve in a laboratory-based environment with these factors strictly controlled.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system might also lead children to have an exaggerated fear of strangers, which could affect relationship development (Jessup & Miller, 2015). Moreover, issuing an Alert may cause an abductor to panic and murder the child (or murder the child earlier than intended) to avoid getting caught (Miller et al, 2009). Despite these risks, these policies are met with initial public acceptance (Hammond et al, 2010), and support for these laws persevere despite evidence of their ineffectiveness (see Applegate, Cullen, Turner, & Sundt, 1996; Livio, 2009).…”
Section: Outcomes Of Cctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these policies vary in strategy and scope, they share striking similarities. Most notably, such reactive crime control policies enjoy widespread public support in spite of empirical failure and unintended negative outcomes (Armstrong, Miller, & Griffin, 2015; Griffin & Miller, 2008; Hammond, Miller, & Griffin, 2010; Levenson & D’Amora, 2007; Miller, Griffin, Clinkenbeard, & Thomas, 2009; Sicafuse & Miller, 2010, 2012; Turner, Sundt, & Applegate, 1995). Because hasty policy responses to rare or heinous crimes create the illusion of crime control despite their ineffectiveness, Griffin and Miller (2008) argue that they are merely a form of “crime control theater” (CCT).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%