1980
DOI: 10.1515/ling.1980.18.3-4.245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The psychological status of a constraint on Japanese consonant alternation

Abstract: The Japanese consonant alternation known as rendaku is a nonautomatic process whereby morphemes with an initial voiceless obstruent in isolation sometimes occur with an initial voiced obstruent as the second element of compounds or stem-affix formations. A putative phonological constraint known as Lyman's Law states that the initial consonant of a morpheme never undergoes rendaku if that morpheme already contains a voiced obstruent. There are only a handful of exceptions to this constraint in the existing voca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…/nise+tokage/ → [nise-tokage] 'fake lizard') Mester, 1986, 2003;Lyman, 1894). Vance (1980) found in a nonce-word experiment that the closer the blocker consonant, the less likely that Rendaku occurs. Therefore, we expect that in words in which the trigger and geminates are non-local, speakers may find devoicing of OCP-violating geminates less natural.…”
Section: Seven Hypotheses Testedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…/nise+tokage/ → [nise-tokage] 'fake lizard') Mester, 1986, 2003;Lyman, 1894). Vance (1980) found in a nonce-word experiment that the closer the blocker consonant, the less likely that Rendaku occurs. Therefore, we expect that in words in which the trigger and geminates are non-local, speakers may find devoicing of OCP-violating geminates less natural.…”
Section: Seven Hypotheses Testedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one problem identified by Kawahara (in press) is that these theoretical claims have been primarily based on intuitions of Nishimura (2003) and Kawahara (2006). Several studies have shown potential pitfalls of an approach purely relying on authors' introspections (see, among others, Alderete and Kochetov 2009;Dabrowska 2010;Gibson and Fedorenko 2010;Griner 2001;Kawahara in press;Labov 1975Labov , 1996Myers 2009;Ohala 1974Ohala , 1986Schütze 1996;Vance 1980 and references cited therein). Since several important theoretical claims have been made based on the Japanese devoicing data, their empirical foundation should ideally be supported by systematic experimentation with a number of theoretically-unbiased native speakers.…”
Section: The Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Native Japanese phonology generally does not allow stems with two voiced obstruents. OCP(voice) also blocks Rendaku, voicing of the initial consonant of the second member of a compound, when the second member already contains a voiced obstruent (Itô & Mester, 1986;Vance, 1980). OCP(voice) in Japanese targets voicing only in obstruents, but not in sonorants (Itô & Mester, 1986;Mester & Itô, 1989).…”
Section: The Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OCP(voice) in Japanese targets voicing only in obstruents, but not in sonorants (Itô & Mester, 1986;Mester & Itô, 1989). See Vance (1980) for an experiment on OCP-induced blockage of Rendaku.…”
Section: The Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation