1984
DOI: 10.1080/10509674.1984.9963763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The psychological profile of the female first offender and the recidivist: A comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, family background factors increased the risk for later problems (Nelson et al, 2002). Based on results from earlier studies, it was expected that recidivists would report higher percentages of physical and sexual abuse than the first-time offenders (Long, Sultan, Kiefer, & Scrum, 1984). The comparison of the recidivists and first-time offenders did not, however, show any significant differences, neither in childhood nor in adulthood experiences of abuse between the groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, family background factors increased the risk for later problems (Nelson et al, 2002). Based on results from earlier studies, it was expected that recidivists would report higher percentages of physical and sexual abuse than the first-time offenders (Long, Sultan, Kiefer, & Scrum, 1984). The comparison of the recidivists and first-time offenders did not, however, show any significant differences, neither in childhood nor in adulthood experiences of abuse between the groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Of studies identified, only a few dealt solely with female inmates and their adjustment to incarceration. Specifically, Long, Sultan, Kiefer, and Schrum (1984) found that first-time female offenders were less likely than recidivists to have been abused and more likely to have been married with children; however, they tended to have similar adjustment patterns. Women with longer sentences and incarceration periods reported less safety concerns than women with shorter sentences and/or time in prison (MacKenzie, Robinson, & Campbell, 1989).…”
Section: Adjustment To Incarcerationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Of particular interest have been studies of novel efforts to prevent recidivism in juvenile first offender populations (e.g., McGarrell & Hipple, 2007;Patrick & Marsh, 2005;Quinn & Van Dyke, 2004;Smith, Usinger-Lesquereux, & Evans, 1999;Sutphen, Thyer, & Kurtz, 1995;Stickle, Connell, Wilson, & Gottfredson, 2008;Wright & Mays, 1998). Attention to adult first offenders, on the other hand, typically concentrates on specific subpopulations, such as driving while intoxicated (DWI) offenders (Cavaiola, Strohmetz, & Abreo, 2007;Gould & Gould, 1992;Kernodle & Joyce, 1995;Knoebel & Ross, 1997;Wheeler & Hissong, 1988), shoplifters (Deng, 1997;LaMontagne, Boyer, Hetu, & Lacerte-Lamontagne, 2000;Ray, Solomon, Doncaster, & Mellina, 1983), female inmates (Long, Sultan, Kiefer, & Schrum, 1985), and sex offenders (Ruddijs & Timmerman, 2000;Stermac & Hall, 1989). Other research explores the nature, determinants, and/or effectiveness of punishment measures for first offenders (Fader, Harris, Jones, & Poulin, 2001;Lee, 1996;Meeker, Jesilow, & Aranda, 1992;Parisi, 1981;Tiffany, Avichai, & Peters, 1975;Vigorita, 2002;Vito & Allen, 1980;Walker, Farrington, & Tucker, 1981;Wilson & Vito, 1990).…”
Section: Research On First Offendersmentioning
confidence: 99%