2010
DOI: 10.3109/01674820903564440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The psychological impact of illness among women experiencing human papillomavirus-related illness or screening interventions

Abstract: The present study describes the psychological impact of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related conditions or preventive interventions on Taiwanese women. Women with an HPV-related diagnosis or intervention within the past 3 months were invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey before the receipt of HPV-related diagnostic results. Participants completed a 29-item HPV impact profile (HIP), which was a questionnaire designed to represent the full spectrum of potential HPV-related impacts. The HIP assesses wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
45
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(33 reference statements)
5
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean total HIP score for women with normal cervical cytology was 22.3, which was similar to mean total scores reported in the studies of Pirotta et al (25.8) [40] and Wang et al (28.2) [41], and about 8 points higher than that observed in the initial validation study for this instrument (14.4) [32]. The apparently elevated HIP scores for women with normal cervical cytology may indicate a negative impact of the cervical screening procedure itself, as observed in studies showing that women undergoing routine gynaecological examinations may experience pain or discomfort, embarrassment, fear, worry, nervousness and inconvenience [42,43].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The mean total HIP score for women with normal cervical cytology was 22.3, which was similar to mean total scores reported in the studies of Pirotta et al (25.8) [40] and Wang et al (28.2) [41], and about 8 points higher than that observed in the initial validation study for this instrument (14.4) [32]. The apparently elevated HIP scores for women with normal cervical cytology may indicate a negative impact of the cervical screening procedure itself, as observed in studies showing that women undergoing routine gynaecological examinations may experience pain or discomfort, embarrassment, fear, worry, nervousness and inconvenience [42,43].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The opposite was seen in women whose abnormal cytology samples were followed with an HPV-positive test. Also in the Taiwanese study by Wang et al ,29 receipt of a positive HPV test after abnormal cytology had a similar psychological impact as a histologically confirmed CIN diagnosis. In contrast, the large Chinese study by Wang et al 31 reported that a histological CIN diagnosis had a significantly worse psychosocial impact compared to a diagnosis of an abnormal smear.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Of these, 15 were consistent with the inclusion criteria; two were from the same study 15 17–27 30–32. Examination of reference lists identified two additional manuscripts published since 1990 28 29. In total, therefore, 17 English-language articles describing 16 studies and published between 1993 and 2011, satisfied our inclusion criteria (see online supplementary figure S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the mean total HIP score was less than 40, it indicated no or little impact; when between 40 and 70, it indicated moderate impact; and above 70, it indicated heavy psychosocial impact. 12 The Chinese version of the HIP questionnaire was generated through a standard linguistic validation process, which included translation, back translation, comparison, review, consolidation, and pilot field testing. 12,13 Quality control was performed throughout the project; we trained the local interviewers before the project started, provided all participants with a letter of introduction describing selfadministration to obtain a more uniform standard for ques-tionnaires, and performed regular daily quality control to ensure the completion of the questionnaires and accuracy of data entry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%