2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1836405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Psychological Costs of Pay-for-Performance: Implications for the Strategic Compensation of Employees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
97
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
6
97
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an important line of inquiry because HR system differentiation has the potential to reduce perceptions of fairness (Lepak et al, ) and organizational commitment (Marescaux, De Winne, & Sels, ) among employees who receive lower investments. Human capital and cost–benefit models based on transaction and labor costs, and the marginal productivity of employees, do not account for the potential psychological and behavioral costs (e.g., Larkin, Pierce, & Gino, ; Pohler & Schmidt, ) associated with the adoption of a differentiated HR architecture within the organization. If employees perceive HR differentiation to be unfair, these costs may include lower performance, job withdrawal, decreased citizenship behaviors, and negative reactions including theft and other retaliatory behaviors (Colquitt, Conlon, Wesson, Porter, & Ng, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important line of inquiry because HR system differentiation has the potential to reduce perceptions of fairness (Lepak et al, ) and organizational commitment (Marescaux, De Winne, & Sels, ) among employees who receive lower investments. Human capital and cost–benefit models based on transaction and labor costs, and the marginal productivity of employees, do not account for the potential psychological and behavioral costs (e.g., Larkin, Pierce, & Gino, ; Pohler & Schmidt, ) associated with the adoption of a differentiated HR architecture within the organization. If employees perceive HR differentiation to be unfair, these costs may include lower performance, job withdrawal, decreased citizenship behaviors, and negative reactions including theft and other retaliatory behaviors (Colquitt, Conlon, Wesson, Porter, & Ng, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See the critique inOsterloh and Frey 2000, Frey and Osterloh 2005, Rost and Osterloh 2009, Weibel et al 2010, Larkin et al 2012, Rost 2017 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third‐party effects, including potential social comparison costs (e.g., envy), are largely absent from the empirical literature on awards, though they are crucial for the aggregate effectiveness of award programs. Social comparison processes have also not yet received much attention in the strategy literature more generally; but there is some recent research providing considerable advances (Larkin et al , ; Nickerson and Zenger, ) and giving a useful overview of research on the topic. These studies focus on the consequences of monetary compensation.…”
Section: Value Destructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is by now ample literature highlighting the limitations of monetary incentives. Not only is money shown to often be ineffective at sustaining employees' motivation; it may even backfire due to motivation crowding‐out (Deci, Koestner, and Ryan, ; Frey, ; Frey and Jegen, ), strategic behavior, and social comparison costs (Larkin, Pierce, and Gino, ; Nickerson and Zenger, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%