2013
DOI: 10.1111/fare.12039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Psychological Availability of Dual‐Earner Parents for Their Children After Work

Abstract: Using data from a sample of Dutch dual‐earner parents (N = 261), this study showed that parents' psychological availability acted as a link between negative and positive workday residuals (i.e., work‐related negative mood, exhaustion, rumination, and work‐related positive mood and vigor) and the quality of parent–child interactions after the workday. Parents' preference for type of role combination moderated these relationships in that evidence for negative spillover was found only for parents who tended to in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
5
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study builds on current knowledge about parent–child relations and work‐to‐family conflict. By distinguishing between the parent's physical availability (the frequency of parent–child activities) and psychological availability (the extent to which the parent is distracted by paid work), we have built on earlier studies that stress the importance of accessibility in family relationships (Danner‐Vlaardingerbroek et al, ; Milkie et al, ). Moreover, our results show that, for fathers, this specific dimension of work‐to‐family conflict is associated with the socioemotional well‐being of children.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study builds on current knowledge about parent–child relations and work‐to‐family conflict. By distinguishing between the parent's physical availability (the frequency of parent–child activities) and psychological availability (the extent to which the parent is distracted by paid work), we have built on earlier studies that stress the importance of accessibility in family relationships (Danner‐Vlaardingerbroek et al, ; Milkie et al, ). Moreover, our results show that, for fathers, this specific dimension of work‐to‐family conflict is associated with the socioemotional well‐being of children.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This body of literature suggests that paid work can interfere with family life and that this interference can harm both parents and children. When parents' work demands are high and parents experience work stress, the quality of interactions with their children and partner is lower (e.g., Danner‐Vlaardingerbroek, Kluwer, Van Steenbergen, & Van der Lippe, ; Repetti, ; Strazdins, Clements, Korda, Broom, & D'Souza, ), and children's well‐being is lower (Crouter & Bumpus, ; Strazdins et al, ; Strazdins, Shipley, Clements, Obrien, & Broom, 2010). Moreover, research suggests that parents report higher‐quality parent–child relationships when parent–child time is not disturbed by paid‐work demands (Roeters, Van der Lippe, & Kluwer, ; Wajcman, ).…”
Section: Prior Research On Quality Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some structural conditions of parents' work environment (e.g., long working hours, atypical schedules, and husband-wife wage differentials) are associated with parental involvement in dual-earner families (Hook & Wolfe, 2013;Wood & Repetti, 2004;Yeung et al, 2001), the way parents perceive balance between their work and family demands exerts a strong influence on parenting (Cinamon, Weisel, & Tzuk, 2007;Corwyn & Bradley, 1999;Perry-Jenkins, Repetti, & Crouter, 2000;Vieira, Matias, Ferreira, Lopez, & Matos, 2016). Some studies reported that parents' WFC, meaning the experience perceived by the parents as not having enough time and energy to manage all work and family responsibilities, has a negative effect on their psychological availability and socioemotional investment in their children (Matias et al, 2017;Corwyn & Bradley, 1999;Danner-Vlaardingerbroek et al, 2013). The experience of WFC may have particularly negative implications for parents' availability to engage in activities that go beyond basic caretaking, namely spending time with the child in positive engagement activities.…”
Section: Work-family Dynamics and Parental Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy is defined herein as the feeling of vitality and being alive (Ryan & Frederick, 1997). Such elevated energy would then manifest more specifically via enhanced receptivity toward the child (Hodgins, Koestner, & Duncan, 1996) and psychological availability to be attuned to the child's viewpoint (Danner-Vlaardingerbroek, Kluwer, Van Steenbergen, & Van der Lippe, 2013). These resources are probably key to provide meaningful choices, to encourage initiative, and to constructively handle child resistance through dialogue.…”
Section: Parents' Own Psychological Need Satisfaction and Parental Aumentioning
confidence: 99%