1976
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1976.tb00274.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Psycholinguistic Unity of Language Learning and Language Change

Abstract: Recent research interest in the performance of second language learners has neglected the area of phonology learning. This report on a longitudinal study shows the viability of using a sociolinguistic model of sound change for studying the process of learning a target language sound system. The model calls for a variability analysis of the phonetic diversity in the learner's speech. The example analysis shows that learners systematically alter their phonetic output in the direction of a particular target. Sign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They reflect the unity underlying child language, L2 acquisition, dialect variation, and historical change (cf. Jakobson 1941;Stampe 1969;Dickerson 1976;Major in press). In this study, the substitutions fall mainly into the following categories: deletion and insertion, lateralization, change from an alveolar to uvular point of articulation, devoicing, and spirantization.…”
Section: Developmental Substitutions and Language Universalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reflect the unity underlying child language, L2 acquisition, dialect variation, and historical change (cf. Jakobson 1941;Stampe 1969;Dickerson 1976;Major in press). In this study, the substitutions fall mainly into the following categories: deletion and insertion, lateralization, change from an alveolar to uvular point of articulation, devoicing, and spirantization.…”
Section: Developmental Substitutions and Language Universalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above methodology for the establishment of the existence of a neutralization rule must be contrasted with that in some of the literature on 1L phonology. For example, Dickerson (1976) argues for a wave model analysis to account for the acquisition of English / l / by a number of Japanese speakers. The purpose of Dickerson's wave model, which makes use of the variable rule in ( 5 ) is to give a systematic account of what might otherwise be considered unsystematic performance.…”
Section: Word-final Obstruents Are Voiceless)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dickerson (1976) a Japanese learning English further shows that Variation depends on the linguistic environment äs well äs the type of utterance (e.g. free conversation or reading).…”
Section: Stylementioning
confidence: 97%