2000
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.12.12.2323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pseudomonas AvrPto Protein Is Differentially Recognized by Tomato and Tobacco and Is Localized to the Plant Plasma Membrane

Abstract: The avrPto gene of Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato triggers race-specific resistance in tomato plants carrying Pto , a resistance gene encoding a protein kinase. When introduced into P. s. tabaci , avrPto triggers resistance in tobacco W38 plants that carry the corresponding R gene. The AvrPto protein is believed to be secreted into host cells through the bacterial type III secretion pathway, where it activates disease resistance in tomato by interacting with Pto. We report here the identification of two distin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
91
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(84 reference statements)
4
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PMA can be used to screen thousands of potential PPI within days (Azmi et al 2012;Popescu et al 2007b), while it would take months to screen the same interactions using SLC. However, unlike SLC, PMA detect direct PPI, outside of the context of the cell, and thus, several factors that may influence kinaseeffector interactions, such as compartmentalization and posttranslational modifications (Dou and Zhou 2012;Feng et al 2012;Shan et al 2000), are excluded. PMA also offer a higher level of control over assay conditions compared with SLC, as well as the ability to assess the amount and integrity of the proteins used to measure the interaction (Kaushansky et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PMA can be used to screen thousands of potential PPI within days (Azmi et al 2012;Popescu et al 2007b), while it would take months to screen the same interactions using SLC. However, unlike SLC, PMA detect direct PPI, outside of the context of the cell, and thus, several factors that may influence kinaseeffector interactions, such as compartmentalization and posttranslational modifications (Dou and Zhou 2012;Feng et al 2012;Shan et al 2000), are excluded. PMA also offer a higher level of control over assay conditions compared with SLC, as well as the ability to assess the amount and integrity of the proteins used to measure the interaction (Kaushansky et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All bacterial effectors that have defined Myr and Palm sites are from plant pathogens, particularly P. syringae, and include the HopZ family, HopF2 (Lewis et al, 2008), AvrPhB, AvrRpm1, AvrB, AvrC, AvrPto (Nimchuk et al, 2000;Shan et al, 2000;Maurer-Stroh & Eisenhaber, 2004;Robert-Seilaniantz et al, 2006) and Xanthomonas XopE1/2 (Thieme et al, 2007). Almost all these effectors encode a Myr motif at their extreme N-terminus that targets them to the plant plasma membrane.…”
Section: Membrane -Targeting Motifs --Myristoylation and Palmitoylationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, AvrPto Y89D , which is unable to interact with PRRs and BAK1 (18, 19), displays compromised virulence function (18). Transient delivery of AvrPto Y89D did not alter miRNA accumulation, nor did delivery of AvrPto G2A , carrying a mutated myristoylation site that disrupts AvrPto host plasma membrane localization ((16, 22), Fig. 3A, S5C).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%