2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0034670511003421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prudent Dissident: Unheroic Resistance in Sophocles'Antigone

Abstract: Most contemporary political theorists who have interpreted Sophocles'Antigonehave focused on the fearsome clash between Antigone and Creon. The relationship between Antigone and her weaker, more cautious sister Ismene has not garnered similar attention. This essay addresses this gap by revisiting the tantalizing possibility that Ismene played a more significant role in resisting Creon than has often been assumed. The essay shifts the analysis ofAntigone, first, by illuminating the complex and fraught relations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another researcher, Françoise Meltzer (2011), presents also about desire in Antigonê. She The fourth study found to present discussion on Sophocles's Antigonê is the one written by Jennet Kirkpatrick (2011). Here she presents a kind of comparison between Antigonê and her sister Ismenê.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another researcher, Françoise Meltzer (2011), presents also about desire in Antigonê. She The fourth study found to present discussion on Sophocles's Antigonê is the one written by Jennet Kirkpatrick (2011). Here she presents a kind of comparison between Antigonê and her sister Ismenê.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This binary logic obscures the complexities of resisting organized atrocity—the difficult choices and situations that stem from resisters’ embeddedness within the very conditions of systemic violence they are fighting to dismantle (Mrovlje 2017). Examples include the human rights violations committed in the service of freedom and justice; the ways in which the pursuit of moral goodness or self-sacrifice may backfire; and the ways that unheroic, compromised actions may constitute powerful avenues of resistance (Kirkpatrick 2011, 414–21; Leebaw 2019, 459–76; Mihai 2019; Mrovlje and Kirkpatrick 2020; Vogler 2020). A consideration of the complex experiences of resistance, these critics argue, can challenge the deeply entrenched patterns of complicity in systemic violence (Leebaw 2019, 475) and disclose “a richer—if less heroic—repertoire of political engagement” (Mihai 2019, 64).…”
Section: An Alternative Framework For Memorializing Betrayalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This essay aims to challenge simplistic practices of memorializing betrayal and examine the ambiguity of betrayal as it arises from the complex circumstances of resistance. Thereby, I contribute to the growing political theory literature that has contested heroic resistance myths and delved into the complexities of resisting state-sponsored violence yet has not explored the difficult issue of betrayal (Kirkpatrick 2011;Leebaw 2019;Mihai 2019Mihai , 2022.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8.Kirkpatrick (2011); see further Frank (2006), 339f. ; Rawlinson (2014), revised as (2016), 83–105; Engelstein (2015); cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%