1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-49458-4_60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Proximity Effect on the Lyman α Forest Due to a Foreground QSO

Abstract: The influence of a foreground QSO on the Lyman α forest of another QSO with higher redshift has been investigated by analyzing the spectra of three such objects at redshifts z = 2 − 2.7. This influence is not contaminated by any projection effects, as opposed to the inverse effect along the line of sight, where incomplete coverage of the QSO continuum emitting region by the Lyman α clouds could contribute to the relative lack of lines. Our results are consistent with the existence of a proximity effect due to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Discussion The anisotropic clustering pattern of absorbers around quasars suggests that the transverse direction is less likely to be illuminated by ionizing photons than the line-of-sight. This suggestion gains credibility in light of the null detections of the transverse proximity effect in the Lyα forests of projected quasar pairs (Crotts 1989;Dobrzycki & Bechtold 1991;Fernandez-Soto, Barcons, Carballo, & Webb 1995;Liske & Williger 2001;Schirber, Miralda-Escudé, & McDonald 2004;Croft 2004, but see Jakobsen et al2003. Although these studies are each based only on a handful of projected pairs, they all come to similar conclusions: the amount of (optically thin) Lyα forest absorption, in the background quasar sightline near the redshift of the foreground quasar, is larger than average rather than smallerthe opposite of what is expected from the transverse proximity effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Discussion The anisotropic clustering pattern of absorbers around quasars suggests that the transverse direction is less likely to be illuminated by ionizing photons than the line-of-sight. This suggestion gains credibility in light of the null detections of the transverse proximity effect in the Lyα forests of projected quasar pairs (Crotts 1989;Dobrzycki & Bechtold 1991;Fernandez-Soto, Barcons, Carballo, & Webb 1995;Liske & Williger 2001;Schirber, Miralda-Escudé, & McDonald 2004;Croft 2004, but see Jakobsen et al2003. Although these studies are each based only on a handful of projected pairs, they all come to similar conclusions: the amount of (optically thin) Lyα forest absorption, in the background quasar sightline near the redshift of the foreground quasar, is larger than average rather than smallerthe opposite of what is expected from the transverse proximity effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…If Nature provides a nearby background quasar sightline, one can also study the transverse proximity effect, which is the expected decrease in absorption in a background quasar's Lyα forest, caused by the transverse ionizing flux of a foreground quasar. The transverse effect has yet to be detected, in spite of many attempts (Crotts 1989;Dobrzycki & Bechtold 1991;Fernandez-Soto, Barcons, Carballo, & Webb 1995;Liske & Williger 2001;Schirber, Miralda-Escudé, & McDonald 2004;Croft 2004, but see Jakobsen et al2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11. Redshift evolution of the UVB modelled by Haardt & Madau (1996) in comparison to previous measurements of the UVB via the proximity effect (Bajtlik et al 1988;Lu et al 1991;Giallongo et al 1993;Williger et al 1994;Bechtold 1994;Fernández-Soto et al 1995;Srianand & Khare 1996;Giallongo et al 1996;Lu et al 1996;Savaglio et al 1997;Cooke et al 1997;Scott et al 2000;Liske & Williger 2001), all for an Einstein-de Sitter universe.…”
Section: An Unbiased Measurement Of the Uv Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…An estimate of the ionizing rate can be obtained by determining the distance from the quasar at which the number of lines is equal to the background expectation. Over the years, measurements of J À21 (assuming UV $ 1:8) have taken values between $0.7 and $3 (Williger et al 1994;Bechtold 1994;Fernandez-Soto et al 1995;Cristiani et al 1995;Giallongo et al 1996;Cooke, Espey, & Carswell 1997;Scott et al 2000;Liske & Williger 2001). Since what is effectively measured is a ratio of proper distances, this analysis should be relatively independent of cosmological parameters.…”
Section: Proximity Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%