2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2020.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Provisional No-Effect Threshold of Sugar Alcohols on Oral Drug Absorption Estimated by Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another potential impact of excipients on oral drug absorption is via alterations in luminal conditions, e.g., an increased water content due to osmotically active sugar alcohols, and increased paracellular transport due to altered lumen tonicity. ,, There is significant interest in these and other excipient effects on oral drug absorption, especially from a regulatory perspective. , As reviewed succinctly by Metry and Polli, changes in drug formulations require extensive studies to evaluate the impact of excipients, with special attention paid to regulatory requirements around bioequivalence testing both in vitro and in vivo. The rat continuous intestinal model presents a useful framework to evaluate changes in C – t profiles due to known or potential excipient effects such as transporter inhibition and the change in luminal velocity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another potential impact of excipients on oral drug absorption is via alterations in luminal conditions, e.g., an increased water content due to osmotically active sugar alcohols, and increased paracellular transport due to altered lumen tonicity. ,, There is significant interest in these and other excipient effects on oral drug absorption, especially from a regulatory perspective. , As reviewed succinctly by Metry and Polli, changes in drug formulations require extensive studies to evaluate the impact of excipients, with special attention paid to regulatory requirements around bioequivalence testing both in vitro and in vivo. The rat continuous intestinal model presents a useful framework to evaluate changes in C – t profiles due to known or potential excipient effects such as transporter inhibition and the change in luminal velocity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Rapid elimination 4,9,29,35 2) Inability of the in-vitro dissolution test to detect in-vivo relevant changes 27 29 3) Changing the levels of absorption modifying excipients in the formulation 28,30,35,36 4) Low permeability 4,14,37 5) Extensive first pass metabolism 9,22 4.1. BE Failures related to peak sharpness (t½Cmax), and gastric solubility In this analysis, drugs were categorised as to whether their t½Cmax was sharp or blunt depending on whether it was greater than or less than 5hrs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already identified in the literature, rapid elimination, especially during the initial elimination phase, makes the Cmax peak sharper, and therefore more vulnerable to changes in absorption kinetics. For many drugs, especially where there is biphasic elimination, the initial decline (alpha phase) may actually depend primarily on distribution kinetics 35 . A similar, perhaps counterintuitive risk factor to Cmax equivalence is absorption rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall results support Chen et al’s observation that 1.25 g sorbitol can impact Class III drug absorption. An in silico model conducted by Yamane et al estimated that a threshold of 400 mg of sugar alcohols will not impact drug absorption ( 34 ).…”
Section: Potential Absortion-modifying Excipientsmentioning
confidence: 99%