2019
DOI: 10.3390/math7030227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prouhet Tarry Escott Problem: A Review

Abstract: This paper presents a review of the Prouhet Tarry Escott problem. The solutions of the Prouhet Tarry Escott problem are significant because of its numerous applications. Available literature about the present topic has been critically examined. The ideal and non-ideal symmetric solutions of the problem are pointed out. The present work also aims to familiarize one with the different existing methods of obtaining the solutions of the Tarry Escott problem. Difficulties and possible future research directions are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1963 Mordell [52] proved that for (k, ℓ) = (2, 3) the only positive integer solutions are given by (x, y) = (2, 1) and (14,5). In 1972 Boyd and Kisilevsky [14] proved that (x, y) = (2, 1), (4, 2), (55,19) are the only positive integer solutions if (k, ℓ) = (3, 4), while Hajdu and Pintér [40] showed that the only positive integer solution for (k, ℓ) = (4, 6) is (7,2). Several results are covered by the theorem of Saradha and Shorey [60] that the only solution with ℓ = 2k is given by (k, ℓ, x, y) = (3,6,8,1).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 1963 Mordell [52] proved that for (k, ℓ) = (2, 3) the only positive integer solutions are given by (x, y) = (2, 1) and (14,5). In 1972 Boyd and Kisilevsky [14] proved that (x, y) = (2, 1), (4, 2), (55,19) are the only positive integer solutions if (k, ℓ) = (3, 4), while Hajdu and Pintér [40] showed that the only positive integer solution for (k, ℓ) = (4, 6) is (7,2). Several results are covered by the theorem of Saradha and Shorey [60] that the only solution with ℓ = 2k is given by (k, ℓ, x, y) = (3,6,8,1).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…corresponding to the case s = 2) are known for 2 ≤ m ≤ 10 and for m = 12. For general information on the PTE-problem we refer to [55]. In this section we shall show that for m ∈ {3, 4, 6} we can construct arbitrarily large integral PTE m sets, that is s sets of m integers having the same sums of j-th powers for 1 ≤ j ≤ m − 1, with s arbitrary.…”
Section: Kindmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our purposes (cf. 4.4), we need n = 2d 4, so we do not dwell on what is known for n 3, instead referring the reader to the survey article [RN19]. We summarize below the cases, with n 4, in which G(e, n) is known to have a non-trivial Q-point.…”
Section: Known Solutions To the Pte Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideal solutions of PTE are known for n = 12. Also, the best non-constructive known solution, that holds for general k, are M (n) ≤ C √ n for some C (see [7]). One could consider a weakening of this problem, where the left and right-hand sides of (1.13) are merely required to be "close to each other".…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%