1940
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.17.3.317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Protoplasmic Viscosity of Paramecium

Abstract: 1. An improved technique for measuring the protoplasmic viscosity of certain types of cell is described. 2. It is shown that the viscosity of Paramecium is not greater than 0.5 c.g.s. unit, and that it may be much less. 3. A simplified type of microscope centrifuge has revealed several sources of error in the centrifuge method customarily employed for the determination of protoplasmic viscosity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Plugging in the relevant numbers ( N, m, m, m/s, s ), it shows that the viscosity of the cytoplasm has to be as large as 0.12 Pa-s to dissipate the input energy, which is 120 times larger than the viscosity of the water. This number is also in direct contradiction to the previously measured cytoplasm viscosity in other ciliates or protists, which is about 0.005–0.05 Pa-s ( 13 , 14 ). These contradictions suggest that it is not possible to dissipate the energy just by the fluid shear in the cytoplasm if the cytoplasm were completely filled with liquid without structures.…”
Section: Existing Mechanisms Fail To Explain the Energy Dissipation I...contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Plugging in the relevant numbers ( N, m, m, m/s, s ), it shows that the viscosity of the cytoplasm has to be as large as 0.12 Pa-s to dissipate the input energy, which is 120 times larger than the viscosity of the water. This number is also in direct contradiction to the previously measured cytoplasm viscosity in other ciliates or protists, which is about 0.005–0.05 Pa-s ( 13 , 14 ). These contradictions suggest that it is not possible to dissipate the energy just by the fluid shear in the cytoplasm if the cytoplasm were completely filled with liquid without structures.…”
Section: Existing Mechanisms Fail To Explain the Energy Dissipation I...contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Note that we use the term "cytoplasmic viscosity" as an effective viscosity for the energy dissipation within the spore, and we are not referring to the viscosity of any particular space within the spore. However, there is no reported measurement regarding the cytoplasmic viscosity of any microsporidian species so far, and previously reported values of cytoplasmic viscosity in other cell types fall into a very wide range (Verkman, 2002 ;Luby-Phelps, 1999 ;Ridgway et al, 2008 ;Swaminathan et al, 1997 ;Brown, 1940 ;Kamitsubo et al, 1989 ;Kalwarczyk et al, 2012 ;Wang et al, 2019 ). We therefore rst computed the result assuming the cytoplasmic viscosity to be 0.05 Pa-sec (Brown, 1940 ), a middle ground value based on the previously reported range in other cell types, and we later re-calculated our predictions using different cytoplasmic viscosity values covering the entire reported range, to assess how much our results vary depending on the degree of uncertainty in the value of cyto-plasmic viscosity.…”
Section: Developing a Mathematical Model For Pt Energeticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no reported measurement regarding the cytoplasmic viscosity of any microsporidian species so far, and previously reported values of cytoplasmic viscosity in other cell types fall into a very wide range. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] We therefore first computed the result assuming the cytoplasmic viscosity to be 0.05 Pa-sec, 34 a middle ground value based on the previously reported range in other cell types, and we later re-calculated our predictions using different cytoplasmic viscosity values covering the entire reported range, to assess how much our results vary depending on the degree of uncertainty in the value of cytoplasmic viscosity. We measured the viscosity of the germination buffer and modified formulations using a commercial rheometer (Fig 4C, see Method section for details).…”
Section: Developing a Mathematical Model For Pt Energeticsmentioning
confidence: 99%