2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Proteogenomic Landscape of Curable Prostate Cancer

Abstract: Highlights d A comprehensive proteomic analyses of localized prostate cancers d Integration of all levels of the central dogma (DNA / RNA / protein) d ETS fusions have divergent effects on transcriptome and proteome d Combining genomics and proteomics improves biomarker performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
236
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
15
236
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly useful in diseases such as PCa, that frequently have a protracted clinical progression rate and may take years for disease recurrence and development to metastatic disease to occur. Previous proteomic studies focused on the characterization of the proteome (and transcriptome) of primary prostate cancer (Iglesias-Gato et al, 2016, Sinha et al, 2019, on proteomic and transcriptomic disease evolution (Latonen et al, 2018) or on the establishment of a diagnostic panel via machine learning (Kim et al, 2016). In contrast to the above studies, our approach is focused on the specific effects of loss of the key transcription factor STAT3 in prostate cells only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly useful in diseases such as PCa, that frequently have a protracted clinical progression rate and may take years for disease recurrence and development to metastatic disease to occur. Previous proteomic studies focused on the characterization of the proteome (and transcriptome) of primary prostate cancer (Iglesias-Gato et al, 2016, Sinha et al, 2019, on proteomic and transcriptomic disease evolution (Latonen et al, 2018) or on the establishment of a diagnostic panel via machine learning (Kim et al, 2016). In contrast to the above studies, our approach is focused on the specific effects of loss of the key transcription factor STAT3 in prostate cells only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, for both ICGC and TCGA 246 validation cohorts, the resulting prognostic subgroups had highly significantly different 247 survival rates. 248 A recent proteomics-based biomarker study of curable prostate cancer reported a stronger 249 link of DNA methylation status to protein than mRNA abundance (Sinha et al, 2019). In line 250 with these findings, we performed a validation of the clinical impact of ZIC2 as one of the 251 candidate genes on more than 12000 micro-arrayed PCa cases.…”
Section: Subsets 212mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Several recent studies combining proteomic and genomic analysis have demonstrated a low degree of concordance between mRNA and protein expression (Johansson et al, 2019;Mertins et al, 2016;Sinha et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2016) , highlighting the importance of protein-level regulation, such as recycling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%