2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-019-02422-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The protein corona suppresses the cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory response in lung epithelial cells and macrophages upon exposure to nanosilica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, the suppression of toxicity was observed upon protein corona formation also on amorphous silica nanoparticles (Lesniak et al 2012;Tenzer et al 2013;Leibe et al 2019), but not all studies have confirmed this finding (Hsiao et al 2019;Deville et al 2020). The partial similarities between amorphous and crystalline silica may suggest the occurrence of common surface features on fractured quartz crystals and some amorphous silicas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, the suppression of toxicity was observed upon protein corona formation also on amorphous silica nanoparticles (Lesniak et al 2012;Tenzer et al 2013;Leibe et al 2019), but not all studies have confirmed this finding (Hsiao et al 2019;Deville et al 2020). The partial similarities between amorphous and crystalline silica may suggest the occurrence of common surface features on fractured quartz crystals and some amorphous silicas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suspending particles in the medium may affect the agglomeration state and particle size due to solubility or protein corona. Especially the particle surface interactions with proteins can influence the biological responses as shown by several authors 8,9 . Due to these disadvantages, expert panels recommend the exposure at the ALI [10][11][12] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tokgun et al 23 demonstrated that among 6, 15, and 30 nm sizes of aSiNPs, 6 nm-sized nanoparticles had strongest cytotoxic effects on A549 cells, and this cytotoxicity came from dead receptor-mediated induction of apoptosis. Liu et al 24 examined the cell viability of A549 cells after exposing to SiO 2 particles at various concentrations (5,10,20,30,40,60,80, and 100 μg/mL). Results of CCK-8 assay showed that exposures of 10-20 nm aSiNPs resulted in significantly decreased viability of A549 cells, while 5 μm SiO 2 particles did not affect the cell viability obviously.…”
Section: Size-dependent Cytotoxicity Of Asinps Size-dependent Cytotoxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Meanwhile, aSiNPs could exert cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in many kinds of cell lines, which was considered through the oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress, autophagy dysfunction or proinflammatory response induced by the particles. 10,11 It is well accepted in nanotoxicology that physicalchemical properties of nanomaterials, such as particle size, surface area, morphology, porosity, aggregation state, crystallinity and other characterizations, should be taken into account when assessing the potential toxicity of nanomaterials in biological systems. As to aSiNPs, a large number of studies have confirmed that these properties could influence the adsorption, distribution, excretion as well as cellular internalization of the particles, which were further associated with the toxic effect in vivo and in vitro.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation