Alternative Theories of the State 2006
DOI: 10.1057/9780230372795_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Protective Response and the Evolution of the Capitalist State

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polanyi’s observation is hugely significant in this respect. As Stanfield and Stanfield (2006: 36) remark, any process of economic integration requires a corresponding social system, and a process of socialisation always institutes the economy. This is significant because it suggests that if there is the sufficient political and social will to recalibrate these measures in the first place, then the space opens up to socialise an alternative, more culturally-embedded political economy of English football.…”
Section: The Counter-attack ‘Against Modern Football’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polanyi’s observation is hugely significant in this respect. As Stanfield and Stanfield (2006: 36) remark, any process of economic integration requires a corresponding social system, and a process of socialisation always institutes the economy. This is significant because it suggests that if there is the sufficient political and social will to recalibrate these measures in the first place, then the space opens up to socialise an alternative, more culturally-embedded political economy of English football.…”
Section: The Counter-attack ‘Against Modern Football’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Note that Post Keynesians in general do not have a clear view of the state and class and while Kalecki had a class analysis, some later Kaleckians do not have it. For the Post Keynesian theory of the state, seePressman (2006b).10 Neither the contribution on the institutionalist perspectives on the state byWaller (2006) nor the 'Polanyian' article byStanfield and Stanfield (2006) inPressman's edited book (2006a) on the theories of the state noticed the importance of Elias for their field of research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%