1980
DOI: 10.1016/0015-6264(80)90067-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The protective potency of marine animal meat against the neurotoxicity of methylmercury: Its relationship with the organ distribution of mercury and selenium in the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tuna supplied approximately 0.3 μg/g more dietary Se [1,4,6,14], and we observed a protective effect of tuna that provided about 0.5 μg/g more Se compared to a corn-soy diet [2] in Japanese quail fed high levels of added MeHg (20 μg/g Hg). It seems likely that the higher content of Se in tuna compared to freshwater pike and other dietary protein sources was a factor involved in our studies and those of others [4,14] that demonstrated protective effects of fish or fish products against MeHg toxicity. Little is known about the chemical forms of Se in the marine world, in contrast to other trace elements such as arsenic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The tuna supplied approximately 0.3 μg/g more dietary Se [1,4,6,14], and we observed a protective effect of tuna that provided about 0.5 μg/g more Se compared to a corn-soy diet [2] in Japanese quail fed high levels of added MeHg (20 μg/g Hg). It seems likely that the higher content of Se in tuna compared to freshwater pike and other dietary protein sources was a factor involved in our studies and those of others [4,14] that demonstrated protective effects of fish or fish products against MeHg toxicity. Little is known about the chemical forms of Se in the marine world, in contrast to other trace elements such as arsenic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Based on the abundance of Se and its favorable molar excess over Hg, ocean fish appear more likely to protect against Hg toxicity than to contribute to causing it. Several studies have demonstrated that Se from yellowfin tuna [7,17], menhaden [18], swordfish [19], and rockfish [20] counteract the adverse impacts of Hg exposure, further supporting the likelihood that Se from fish provides significant natural protection. However, risks associated with consumption of certain seafoods that contain high and disproportionate amounts of Hg in molar excess of Se are expected to be directly related to their Hg to Se ratios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, the molecular mechanisms responsible for these toxic effects remain incompletely defined, making it difficult to evaluate risks associated with low-level MeHg exposures from seafood consumption [1][2][3][4]. Selenium (Se)-dependent protection against Hg toxicity has been recognized for 50 years [5] and has since been demonstrated in all species evaluated [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], but the molecular mechanism responsible for Se-dependent protective effects remains as incompletely defined as those of Hg toxicity. However, because of the high binding affinity (10 45 M) between Hg and Se [23], direct Hg sequestration by Se has often been assumed responsible for the mechanism of Se's protective effect [1,24,25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies demonstrating Se-dependent amelioration of MeHg toxicity have included Se from yellowfin tuna (Ohi et al, 1976;Ganther et al, 1972), menhaden (Stillings et al, 1974), swordfish (Freidman et al, 1978), and rockfish (Ohi et al, 1980). Therefore, the organic forms of Se present in ocean fish are bioavailable and effective in counteracting MeHg toxicity.…”
Section: Mercury Interactions With Seleniummentioning
confidence: 98%