2013
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31828e5ccf
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Protective Effects of Volatile Anesthestics Against the Bronchoconstriction Induced by an Allergic Reaction in Sensitized Rabbit Pups

Abstract: Our results reveal the lack of potential of the commonly used volatile anesthetics to inhibit the most severe acute phase of the constrictor response to allergen after anaphylaxis in both the central airway and peripheral lung compartments. Inhalation of volatile anesthetics, particularly sevoflurane, promotes an earlier easing of the bronchospasm; this beneficial profile may be advantageous in children with atopic lung diseases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no differences in basal airway or respiratory tissue mechanical parameters between the different groups. These findings are in agreement with previous reports of the lack of effect of OVA sensitization and atropine on baseline respiratory mechanics . However, in the present study there was an increase in static lung volume in atropine‐treated rats.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…There were no differences in basal airway or respiratory tissue mechanical parameters between the different groups. These findings are in agreement with previous reports of the lack of effect of OVA sensitization and atropine on baseline respiratory mechanics . However, in the present study there was an increase in static lung volume in atropine‐treated rats.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Respiratory system mechanical parameters obtained in BL conditions or following induction of lung injury exhibited excellent agreement with previous data from the same species with similar weight range [ 14 16 , 28 ]. Furthermore, the time course of the respiratory mechanical parameters over 5 h of ventilation in the control groups is in accordance with that observed previously in an experimental model using adult rabbits [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, indirect mechanisms associated with prevention of lung volume loss by inhibiting peripheral airway closures might have also contributed to the observed effects of levosimendan on the G and H responses. Interestingly, the ability of levosimendan to prevent MCh-induced elevations in respiratory tissue damping and stiffness is more pronounced than that of the volatile anesthetic agents, where opening the K ATP channels has little (24) or no effect on this lung compartment (17,28). This feature of levosimendan confirms its potent beneficial action on the lung periphery, as outlined above.…”
Section: Systemic Circulatory Effects Of Levosimendanmentioning
confidence: 68%