2006
DOI: 10.1191/0748233706th254oa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The protective effect of hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate against the adverse effects of Aflatoxin B1 on D. melanogaster

Abstract: The main aim of this study was to investigate the effects of Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and Aflatoxin B1 + hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate (HSCAS) on various developmental stages of Drosophila melanogaster. Different concentrations of AFB1 and HSCAS + AFB1 were administered during the developmental periods of the fly (egg, larvae and pupae). When the F1 progeny of control and application groups were compared, AFB1 was found to extend the process of metamorphosis and decrease the total number of offspring. How… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, as the concentration of AFB 1 increased, more malformed adult (wings, leg and thorax) individuals of D. melanogaster were observed. Exposure to 800 µg/kg AFB 1 resulted in 11% malformation as opposed to 7% for larvae exposed to 200 µg/kg AFB 1 (Şişman 2006 ). Furthermore, feeding D. melanogaster (strain Oregon R) with 10,000 µg/kg AFB 1 resulted in a doubling of larval and pupal development time (Kirk et al 1971 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as the concentration of AFB 1 increased, more malformed adult (wings, leg and thorax) individuals of D. melanogaster were observed. Exposure to 800 µg/kg AFB 1 resulted in 11% malformation as opposed to 7% for larvae exposed to 200 µg/kg AFB 1 (Şişman 2006 ). Furthermore, feeding D. melanogaster (strain Oregon R) with 10,000 µg/kg AFB 1 resulted in a doubling of larval and pupal development time (Kirk et al 1971 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical adsorbents such as propylthiol-functionalized SBA-15 silica [ 160 ], magnetic carbon nanotubes (Fe 3 O 4 − MWCNTs adsorbent) [ 161 ], and sulfhydryl-terminated magnetic bead separation [ 162 ] are more often used. Hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicates (HSCASs), obtained from natural aeolite are the most commonly used clay-based adsorbents [ 163 ]. These adsorbents include clay, cholestyramine, esterified glucomannan, activated charcoal, and other modified polymers, and they absorb OTA, AFB1, ZEN, DON, FB1, and T-2 toxin in the range of 17% to 100% in liquid environments.…”
Section: Mitigation Policies Of Mycotoxin Contamination In Beveragesmentioning
confidence: 99%