1991
DOI: 10.1136/thx.46.1.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The protective effect of a beta 2 agonist against excessive airway narrowing in response to bronchoconstrictor stimuli in asthma and chronic obstructive lung disease.

Abstract: Beta2 agonists reduce airway hypersensitivity to bronchoconstrictor stimuli acutely in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive lung disease. To determine whether these drugs also protect against excessive airway narrowing, the effect of inhaled salbutamol on the position and shape of the doseresponse curve for histamine or methacholine was investigated in 12 patients with asthma and 11 with chronic obstructive lung disease. After pretreatment with salbutamol (200 or 400 pg) or placebo in a double blind ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results differ from the previous report by BEL et al [3] when the protective effect of salbutamol was followed by a sudden fall in FEV1. It is speculated that this may have been a consequence of the short duration of action of salbutamol and not to a true increased reactivity of the airways.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results differ from the previous report by BEL et al [3] when the protective effect of salbutamol was followed by a sudden fall in FEV1. It is speculated that this may have been a consequence of the short duration of action of salbutamol and not to a true increased reactivity of the airways.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…It may be possible this is partly a result of a change in perception of dyspnoea due to the b 2 -agonist. Furthermore, the suggestion has been made that after prior administration of a bronchodilator, there may be an exaggerated fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) when the bronchial provocation test is continued [3]. Therefore, this study investigated whether poor perception of dyspnoea may be caused by long-acting b 2 -agonist treatment, by assessing dyspnoea scores during a provocation test performed after maximal bronchodilation from inhaled long-acting b 2 -agonists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AHR in patients with asthma is characterised by the loss of the maximal or plateau response that is observed in normal subjects [182,183]. One study has shown that plateau responses occur in patients with COPD [184] and another has not [185]. In addition, while patients with asthma respond to both direct smooth muscle/ nerve stimulation and to indirect stimuli, patients with COPD generally respond only to direct smooth muscle stimulation with histamine or methacholine [9,184].…”
Section: Ahr: Asthma Versus Copdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A maximal response that is increased to a severe or even unmeasurable degree of airway narrowing is potentially dangerous. The major reason why asthmatics get into trouble is not primarily the increased sensitivity of their airways to bronchoconstrictor stimuli, but the excessive degree of airway narrowing [23,24]. Successful treatment of their asthma, therefore, should be directed towards preventing or at least diminishing this excessive response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%